@Metal-Brain
You mean you don't believe there are retroreflectors on the moon?
The US is not the only one with mirrors on the moon and all you have to do is google mirrors on the moon but that would be too much for you since it would actually show you about them.
https://news.cnrs.fr/videos/bouncing-lasers-off-the-moon
@metal-brain saidYou link to an one-ghour video. Please give the (at least estimated) time.
@divegeester
https://documentaryheaven.com/apollo-zero/
@Ponderable
Don't bother, it is another Apollo denier and all the so called points have been refuted decades ago.
I WORKED on Apollo, Apollo Tracking and Timing and I can tell you there would not have been that job at all if the landings were faked. I can tell you exactly what my job was and the training I went through back then.
The soviets tracked Apollo with their radar and if they suspected a fake they would have screamed to high heaven and the denier story was STARTED by a US citizen, which tells you something right there.
In order to have pulled off such a scam it would have required the knowing help of literally thousands of workers like me and I was THERE and saw it happen. Good luck with that dude convincing US it was faked.
The make out it was all animated or some such when the computers I worked on didn't even have keyboards much less monitors able to create fake video's so good luck getting that technology to have made movies of the landings and such.
And the cannot explain how there are retroreflectors on the moon, THREE of them by Apollo astronauts and 2 soviet which were on rovers but ours were placed on the ground, funny we didn't have robots able to do that job back then.
@divegeester
He always says what his boss Putin wants him to say no matter how many times he refuted the last post. Don't forget, he is an avowed communist and that is not hyperbole, he said that himself, I didn't make that up.
@sonhouse saidSo you want me to believe pictures prove something?
@Metal-Brain
You mean you don't believe there are retroreflectors on the moon?
The US is not the only one with mirrors on the moon and all you have to do is google mirrors on the moon but that would be too much for you since it would actually show you about them.
https://news.cnrs.fr/videos/bouncing-lasers-off-the-moon
Why doesn't Bill Clinton believe man was on the moon?
-Removed-It is the very first thing in the film, but you don't have the courage to watch the first minute of the film. Find an excuse to not even try to watch it. You know you don't want to watch any of it. You don't want to be confused with facts.
Tell yourself it is stupid nonsense and you have better things to do with your time. Watching the first minute is too much time wasted. Tell yourself that. You know you want to. Bill Clinton wrote it in his book. He said some carpenter told him they can fake things like that and he thought the guy was crazy. Now he thinks that guy was ahead of his time. First minute of the film.
Speculation is that Bill Clinton didn't want his legacy to be of him condoning a moon landing lie because he knew the truth would come out some day, so he put the truth in his book to protect his legacy in the history books. He didn't want his legacy tainted by condoning a lie.
@Metal-Brain
You speak with forked tongue, on one hand you say the moon landing was real and on the other hand you say there are no retroreflectors on the moon. If that is the case how are we getting the distance to the moon within an inch or so? You have to realize a laser just blasting the surface of the moon will encounter hills and valleys that will alter the return times of the laser beam but here we have photons that stay on the exact same time frame, something absolutely impossible just lasering the surface. But I guess that means nothing to you either.
How come you think there were no retroreflectors on the moon in spite of the fact your favorite country put TWO of them there, RUSSIA did that.
Does that mean anything to you, an avowed communist?
@sonhouse saidStop lying. I never said the moon landing was real. I said I didn't know.
@Metal-Brain
You speak with forked tongue, on one hand you say the moon landing was real and on the other hand you say there are no retroreflectors on the moon. If that is the case how are we getting the distance to the moon within an inch or so? You have to realize a laser just blasting the surface of the moon will encounter hills and valleys that will alter the return tim ...[text shortened]... ountry put TWO of them there, RUSSIA did that.
Does that mean anything to you, an avowed communist?
Retroreflectors on the moon are not necessary to measure the distance. If you had watched the documentary I posted you would know that. What excuse did you use to not watch it?
https://documentaryheaven.com/apollo-zero/
"How come you think there were no retroreflectors on the moon in spite of the fact your favorite country put TWO of them there, RUSSIA did that"
Russia put men on the moon?
@metal-brain saidYou lied (by your own standards) it is the thirs scene after about two minutes and it is not forseeable.
It is the very first thing in the film, but you don't have the courage to watch the first minute of the film. Find an excuse to not even try to watch it. You know you don't want to watch any of it. You don't want to be confused with facts.
Tell yourself it is stupid nonsense and you have better things to do with your time. Watching the first minute is too much time wa ...[text shortened]... ok to protect his legacy in the history books. He didn't want his legacy tainted by condoning a lie.
Then you lied (by your own standards)whan telling us it was in the first minute.
Bill Clinton is a moon landing denier, but he was not always one. After he became President he changed his mind. Said the guy that told him it might be faked was ahead of his time.
was what you wrote. In fact the Clinton quote from his book was that he thought the guy a crank before he became president, and thought about the possibilities of deception differntly when he was in the white House.
Please:
* Quote the original source (here Clinton's autobiography is the Source, the video quotes directly from that).
Then try to understand what is actaully in the original source.
Then: Don't ask people to watse (potentially) an hour watching soemthing to get what you should be able to procure faster than you write your disparaging post.
The answer clearly:
Are you convited that the Appollo mission led to monn landings. Yes or No.?