Originally posted by SuzianneDo you think divegeester's quip to wolfgang59 about Grampy Bobby's copy pasting might mean divegeester is "an enemy of God"? Surely that can't be what josephw means, not in all seriousness, right? So he needs to explain what he meant.
Were you not allowed to express anger as a child?
Originally posted by divegeesterI don't think he's been termed a 'bitch', or told to 'shut the F### up' or 'a prick' or 'a bell end' or any of the other rather colourful foul mothed sayings that you evocatively employ. Meh but what are to expect from a real slithery Son of Satan?
You got "slime" also. I've never had that one.
On reflection I think my list of received insults is far better than yours.
Being an "Enemy of God" because I think Grampy Bobby is ignoring his detractors, is a new one for me.
08 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat would you rather be: a bell-end or a son of satan?
I don't think he's been termed a 'bitch', or told to 'shut the F### up' or 'a prick' or 'a bell end' or any of the other rather colourful foul mothed sayings that you evocatively employ. Meh but what are to expect from a real slithery Son of Satan?
What's worse??
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeLol.
In my day the question was; 'what would you rather be, an astronaut or a cowboy?'
How times have changed...
Nevertheless carrobie won't answer. He can't of course because if he says being a "bell-end" is worse than being called a "son of the devil", then what does that say for his religious perspective. If he says its the other way round, he loses the argument and has to accept that he cast worse insults than me.
Basically, he's a massive bell-end.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by SeitseWhere is the evidence of mocking "cancer survival, suicide, and other sensitive subjects which can deeply hurt people"?
The two of you are quite a disappointment, really. It's the internet,
of course, but I used to sense none of you would side with someone
who mocks cancer survival, suicide, and other sensitive subjects
which can deeply hurt people.
Even I have limits, for I keep myself within the boundaries of poop
and naughty humor.
Shame on you both.
Originally posted by FMFSo you repeat your mistake. I bet you don't even understand what you're saying. You're just trying to have a poke at him because you simply don't understand what he said. And he's not helping you out in your desire to make him seem a fool.
I didn't call josephw "passive aggressive" because he was criticizing me. I was simply describing his behaviour on pages 13, 14 and 15. You have misused the term several times. josephw was trying to say something nasty to divegeester without actually saying it himself. He hid behind a Bible quote and refused to explain how he thought the quote applied to divegeester. It's about as "passive aggressive" as one can get. 😉
It's about as "passive aggressive" as one can get.
Yep, that right. No, you, not him. It's hilarious that you call him out for supposedly doing something that you yourself are guilty of. And of course, your sycophant doesn't get it, either.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou are either unaware of what "passive aggressive" posting is, or you're pretending not to understand. Pages 13-14-15 - josephw's use of James 4:4 and his refusal to explain how he thinks it applies to his fellow Christian = "passive aggressive". Nothing I posted qualifies as "passive aggressive". I think you are just pretending not to understand.
So you repeat your mistake. I bet you don't even understand what you're saying. You're just trying to have a poke at him because you simply don't understand what he said. And he's not helping you out in your desire to make him seem a fool.
[b]It's about as "passive aggressive" as one can get.
Yep, that right. No, you, not him. It's hilarious th ...[text shortened]... omething that you yourself are guilty of. And of course, your sycophant doesn't get it, either.[/b]