08 Feb 16
Originally posted by josephwIt appears to me to be another cheap shot from you. You are aware of how easy it is to throw cheap shots don't you. You will probably notice that I never use Biblical scripture to score cheap points. I don't think that is how God would want the bible used.
Why should I PM divegeester?
[b]"Just say how you think a verse about someone being "an enemy of God" applies to divegeester."
Hey, you said it. I didn't. I haven't said anything I feel I need to acquit myself of.[/b]
08 Feb 16
Originally posted by divegeesterI quite like the term "Bibble verses" for Bible citations wielded in order to land shoddy blows online e.g. citing a verse with the word "fool" in it when you disagree with someone.
Rather than public ally throwing Bibble verses out and trying to hide behind them, why don't you actually address me directly with whatever accusation is on you mind, why you think you are justified and what action you think should take to address your concerns?
To Bibble (verb), Bibbler (noun), Bibblish (noun), Bibbly (adjective), Bibblily (abverb).
08 Feb 16
Originally posted by josephwPage 13
Sorry FMF that you don't understand what James 4:4 means. Study up on it and reread the post by divegeester and my reply to it. Then tell me what you think it means based on the context of the posts in question.
If you so desire. Another alternative might be for you to PM divegeester and ask him.
The post of mine to which to replied with James 4:4, was me replying to Wolfgang59. I made a comment about GB ignoring posts made directly to him (which he does all the time to all of his detractors) and instead copy/pasting various secular quotations and platitudes.
In reply to this you said:
You pick the strangest bedfellows geester. James 4:4
So who is the strange bedfellow, wolfgang59?
Are you saying that I am an enemy of God because I challenge Grampy Bobby about his posting style, or because I talk to Wolfgang59 about it?
Originally posted by FMFOr citing a verse with "satan" in it if one really wants to get below the belt.
I quite like the term "Bibble verses" for Bible citations wielded in order to land shoddy blows online e.g. citing a verse with the word "fool" in it when you disagree with someone.
To Bibble (verb), Bibbler (noun), Bibblish (noun), Bibbly (adjective), Bibblily (abverb).
Using a bible verse about being "an enemy of God" as an insult aimed at another Christian in order to score points in an internet argument, has got to be one of the most mealy-mouthed tactics I've seen here.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by SuzianneIt's classic FMF behaviour.
Well, I dunno.
Peruse this:
Originally posted by FMF
[b]Don't you see any hypocrisy in yourself for not tackling "the same few posters who hope to dominate and belittle the others, prove that they are right, and disintegrate every decent thread" when... what? Ah yes... when they are defending [in their own peculiarly raw and abusive way] Grampy ...[text shortened]... to defend him against that false narrative. She "let it pass", and you got away with doing it.
His geester sidekick, in another thread a day or so ago, enjoyed instructing me that a fellow RHP member is a pariah. I responded with words to the effect that no decent Christian (because Divegeester, despite the available evidence, advertises himself as such) would consider anyone a pariah.
While not using that explicit concept, I've come to the conclusion that both these aforementioned posters are a blight on any forum. They seek to stifle and control discussion, forcing poster after poster to submit to inquisition and cross-examination, and diverting and controlling any thread according to their own purposes. In truth, since their technique is the same whatever a thread's subject, their overriding purpose is clearly to control and destroy.
I've come to the conclusion that the only recourse open to genuine, well-intentioned forum members is to pay them absolutely no attention whatsoever.
I recommend this course of action to all forum members who dislike the antics of this gruesome twosome.
08 Feb 16
Originally posted by StartreaderOn these boards over the past couple of years and in addition to the diatribe you levied against me recently (about being a torturer etc), I have been called, by Christians whom you class as your friends here:
It's classic FMF behaviour.
His geester sidekick, in another thread a day or so ago, enjoyed instructing me that a fellow RHP member is a pariah. I responded with words to the effect that no decent Christian (because Divegeester, despite the available evidence, advertises himself as such) would consider anyone a pariah.
While not using that expli ...[text shortened]... mend this course of action to all forum members who dislike the antics of this gruesome twosome.
an enemy of god (currently under discussion in this thread)
a son of Satan
worse than Satan
a christian basher
a christian hater
an underminer of the faith of others
evil
deserving to be burnt in hell for eternity
vile
and a host of other disgraceful names and insults. And why? Because I disagree with them on the internet.
You think calling someone a forum pariah is a bad thing. How come I never see you (or Suzianne) calling out those who abuse me in this manner?
08 Feb 16
Originally posted by divegeesterrobbie carrobie has called me "filth" at least once but not you. So that's something that differentiates us, perhaps.
an enemy of god (currently under discussion in this thread)
a son of Satan
worse than Satan
a christian basher
a christian hater
an underminer of the faith of others
evil
deserving to be burnt in hell for eternity
vile
Guys, why are you still mudslinging with the Bob's minions? It is
like wrestling with a pig. You get dirty and the pig enjoys it.
It is quite simple: after Bob's less than christian behavior (which is
ok unless you portray yourself as the second Paul) anyone still
backing him up is like him, or worse. No remorse, no compassion.
Pure filth.
Let's move on and talk about funny or interesting stuff. They're all
the same type of troll. Come on.
08 Feb 16
Originally posted by StartreaderOriginally posted by Startreader
It's classic FMF behaviour.
His geester sidekick, in another thread a day or so ago, enjoyed instructing me that a fellow RHP member is a pariah. I responded with words to the effect that no decent Christian (because Divegeester, despite the available evidence, advertises himself as such) would consider anyone a pariah.
While not using that expli ...[text shortened]... mend this course of action to all forum members who dislike the antics of this gruesome twosome.
"I've come to the conclusion that the only recourse open to genuine, well-intentioned forum members is to pay them absolutely no attention whatsoever."
_____________
Startreader, @Crowley would agree.
Originally posted by SeitseThe dweebsters posts have become so monotonous its just like wave after wave of muffled trumpet sound, whup whup whah. I don't even bother to read them any more. One can practically predict what they are going to post. Remember you said this in 1978. . . . whup whup wah.
Guys, why are you still mudslinging with the Bob's minions? It is
like wrestling with a pig. You get dirty and the pig enjoys it.
It is quite simple: after Bob's less than christian behavior (which is
ok unless you portray yourself as the second Paul) anyone still
backing him up is like him, or worse. No remorse, no compassion.
Pure filth.
Let's move on and talk about funny or interesting stuff. They're all
the same type of troll. Come on.
08 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell, he has neither betrayed me nor supported someone who
The dweebsters posts have become so monotonous its just like wave after wave of muffled trumpet sound, whup whup whah. I don't even bother to read them any more.
backstabbed me, so he is more than o.k. in my book.
Sadly, I cannot say the same about Bob, you, Startreader,
Suzianne, the ghosts, and the rest of the Axis of Evil.