Originally posted by Grampy BobbyJust read his profile.
Originally posted by Startreader
"I've come to the conclusion that the only recourse open to genuine, well-intentioned forum members is to pay them absolutely no attention whatsoever."
_____________
Startreader, @Crowley would agree.
Crowley is a wise RHP member. Tailor-made advice for this particular situation.
Originally posted by SeitseThe mujihaddeen claim to be fighters against evil too😵
Well, he has neither betrayed me nor supported someone who
backstabbed me, so he is more than o.k. in my book.
Sadly, I cannot say the same about Bob, you, Startreader,
Suzianne, the ghosts, and the rest of the Axis of Evil.
The two of you are quite a disappointment, really. It's the internet,
of course, but I used to sense none of you would side with someone
who mocks cancer survival, suicide, and other sensitive subjects
which can deeply hurt people.
Even I have limits, for I keep myself within the boundaries of poop
and naughty humor.
Shame on you both.
Originally posted by FMFOh, the irony.
Indeed it was, sorry. But as you will be aware, it was obviously an ironic reference to Grampy Bobby's behaviour. Looking at the verse in question, it would seem that perhaps you were trying to 'say' the nastiest thing possible to a fellow Christian, but to do so without actually 'saying it'. This is why I mentioned your 'passive aggression'.
And whether the ...[text shortened]... ain what point you were actually trying to make. This is why I mentioned your 'lack of courage'.
This thread is turning into a demonstration of "My enemies enemy is my friend"
it's like pre-WW1 - whose side you gonna be on? I've respect for all sides on here
even though most (perhaps all) have behaved like pratts (probably including myself)
from time to time.
Don't run with the crowd. .
Originally posted by FMFI just don't know how to respond to this. You whine about someone criticizing you by calling them "passive aggressive" because you don't understand the reference, or, more likely, that you can't believe it applies to you in any way, and then, when you're done with your judgement of them, along with your guarded slur on me, you end with a "smiley".
Suzianne, you sometimes have difficulty understanding the concept of "passive aggression". Well, josephw has served up a textbook case of it here since page 13. Just so you know. 😉
Unbelievable. And yet you claim that I don't understand what "passive aggressive" means and then you offer a perfect example of your own "passive aggressive" behavior unintentionally.
Actually, I do know how to respond to this. Maybe you should quit talking to me about other people until you can get your own stuff straight.
Originally posted by FMFThis is merely feigned ignorance, and this is related to "learned helplessness" in regards to "passive aggression". Perhaps also a classic "stalling for time" maneuver, like people who constantly say "huh?" or "what?" when you talk to them.
Which bit?
Were you not allowed to express anger as a child?
Originally posted by SuzianneI didn't call josephw "passive aggressive" because he was criticizing me. I was simply describing his behaviour on pages 13, 14 and 15. You have misused the term several times. josephw was trying to say something nasty to divegeester without actually saying it himself. He hid behind a Bible quote and refused to explain how he thought the quote applied to divegeester. It's about as "passive aggressive" as one can get. 😉
I just don't know how to respond to this. You whine about someone criticizing you by calling them "passive aggressive" because you don't understand the reference, or, more likely, that you can't believe it applies to you in any way, and then, when you're done with your judgement of them, along with your guarded slur on me, you end with a "smiley".
Originally posted by SuzianneI don't think I did offer an example in the way I talked to josephw. You're wrong.
Unbelievable. And yet you claim that I don't understand what "passive aggressive" means and then you offer a perfect example of your own "passive aggressive" behavior unintentionally.
Originally posted by SuzianneSo, you can't explain what the irony was?
This is merely feigned ignorance, and this is related to "learned helplessness" in regards to "passive aggression". Perhaps also a classic "stalling for time" maneuver, like people who constantly say "huh?" or "what?" when you talk to them. Were you not allowed to express anger as a child?
Originally posted by SeitseWell, at least you're trending.
The two of you are quite a disappointment, really. It's the internet,
of course, but I used to sense none of you would side with someone
who mocks cancer survival, suicide, and other sensitive subjects
which can deeply hurt people.
Even I have limits, for I keep myself within the boundaries of poop
and naughty humor.
Shame on you both.
It seems like it's "cool" now to be constantly offended by something.
Especially stuff that was never meant to be offensive.
That way you can be the one to assign blame.
The spotlight can be addictive, yes?