Memo

Originally posted by FMF
[b]"...and in an indirect sense [an insult] to the rest of the human race". ~ Grampy Bobby.[/b]

I guess Gramp Bobby has achieved his aim of making this thread about him again.

Originally posted by divegeester
I'm enjoying watching you troll through the grief of millions in another vain attempt to draw interest to yourself.

What can you expect from people who have a complete disregard
for human dignity; people devoid of compassion up to an outright
sociopathic level?

Originally posted by FMF
You are still asking after several decades: why did he commit suicide? Have you considered - at any point during those decades - that the answer is most likely depression and mental illness?

"The question "Why?" still remains."
in context refers to this family which is "twice removed" from mine
,i.e. the question is theirs not mine..

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"The question "Why?" still remains."
in context refers to this family which is "twice removed" from mine
,i.e. the question is theirs not mine..

The point is of course, such an occurrence can happen in 'any' family and the question can easily be our own. Experience has taught me that suicidal thought 'can' be present in people who give no outward sign what they are going through internally. We might like to distance ourselves from suicide and think it happens to people far removed from ourselves, but despair or mental health issues can happen to anyone.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"The question "Why?" still remains."
in context refers to this family which is "twice removed" from mine
,i.e. the question is theirs not mine..

Like I said. "Mental illness" is almost certainly the answer. Have they really gone "several decades" wondering whether it wasn't because of mental illness?

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"The question "Why?" still remains."
in context refers to this family which is "twice removed" from mine
,i.e. the question is theirs not mine..

Hardly worth mentioning as an anecdote then was it?

I mean, I know of millions of people who have committed suicide and I'm pretty sure that thousands of them would be within a few places removed from me personally. Perhaps I should mention them all in order to underline my opinion that suicide is not an insult to anyone.

Originally posted by FMF
What it says about me is that I don't believe I can make myself immortal by believing in a supernatural being and I see such ideas as being entirely superstitious. There is no better vocabulary item to express my perspective.

Didn't you recently declare yourself to be a person who believes in calling things how you see them regardless of whether it makes oth ...[text shortened]... t]. In light of this, I don't understand why you don't see the same principle behind my candour.

Is it that you are unable or unwilling to respect another's beliefs?

Originally posted by FMF
Indeed, you said it on this thread:[b] "I've always found in life that speaking as one finds is the best way forward. Perhaps the direct approach is uncomfortable for some?" As I said at the time, if this is the philosophy of forum participation you profess, do you recognize it and respect it in others?[/b]

See my reply above to your friend. I notice that you're now posting in the first person plural.

Tweedledum and Tweedledee.

Originally posted by Startreader
Is it that you are unable or unwilling to respect another's beliefs?

Like I said, there is no better word than superstition to express my perspective.

Let me hold up a mirror for a moment. Is your labelling of my expression of my belief as "denigrating" someone else a sign that you are unable or unwilling to respect my perspective and the reason for my word choice?

Originally posted by FMF
Like I said, there is no better word than superstition to express my perspective.

Let me hold up a mirror for a moment. Is your labelling of my expression of my belief as "denigrating" someone else a sign that you are unable or unwilling to respect my perspective and the reason for my word choice?

It means you were offensive and disrespectful to another's beliefs.

And no, I'm not playing your pretend cross-examination game.

Originally posted by Startreader
See my reply above to your friend. I notice that you're now posting in the first person plural.

Tweedledum and Tweedledee.

This is a feeble dodge. My question was a direct response to something you posted.

Originally posted by Startreader
See my reply above to your friend. I notice that you're now posting in the first person plural.

Tweedledum and Tweedledee.

😵

Originally posted by Startreader
It means you were offensive and disrespectful to another's beliefs.

What synonym for "superstition" do you suggest I use? I am using it to mean a belief in a supernatural realm and supernatural processes that contradict science. I think it's the spot on word. What word means the same thing but isn't "offensive and disrespectful" in your opinion?

Originally posted by Startreader
Tweedledum and Tweedledee.

What about you and robbie? You both use basically the same avatar and when you dodge a post of mine by typing "Tweedledum and Tweedledee", he posts an approving smiley. Is that also a case of "Tweedledum and Tweedledee"? 😉

Originally posted by FMF
What about you and robbie? You both use basically the same avatar and when you dodge a post of mine by typing "Tweedledum and Tweedledee", he posts an approving smiley. Is that also a case of "Tweedledum and Tweedledee"? 😉

We are more like Captain Kirk and Spok, I the unperturbed logician, Startreader indomitable in spirit! You are just plain old Tweedledum and Tweedledee.