Originally posted by GHOST HUNTERIf you don't think "the ratings actually mean something", why are you mentioning my ability at chess then, especially when it's one of the dreariest and most hackneyed deflections imaginable?
i am curious, do you think the rating actually means something?.
Originally posted by FMFπ My own rating was static for a long time on the site I admin, but just a few small changes made a big difference. (No need to study the game to develop,..although that also helps).
I have never made any claim whatsoever to be engaged in anything that could even remotely be described as "chess development." I am not "at some stage" of something. I am completely static, inert and not expanding in any way and don't think I have to any appreciable degree in my 900+ games. I may be a "bunny" but I am not moving through "stages" or "developing". So I am not a moving target ~ and therefore the "bashing" is made easier. π
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeI give away my Queen or Rooks trapped in the corner or don't visualize the Knights' moves just as often and with just as much obliviousness (and lack of concern) now as I did 900 games ago. I can assure you, I do not play chess in an effort to be good or better at it. π΅
π My own rating was static for a long time on the site I admin, but just a few small changes made a big difference. (No need to study the game to develop,..although that also helps).
01 Feb 16
Originally posted by GHOST HUNTERRatings are a guide to a person's playing strength, but meaningless apart from that. (Not even comparable across chess sites).
send over a challenge, see if you can back up your mouth
first 20 games on here, not many will play a p rated player.only other p raters seen to accept, not my fault i did beat GB twice, although they were unrated and i think he went easy on me.
i am not mocking them for a low rating, i am trying to help, i recommended a book and told them if they pra ...[text shortened]... king GB, they might improve.
i am curious, do you think the rating actually means something?.
I play chess to have a good game and a fun conversation. I think you would fail to deliver on the latter.
Originally posted by FMFNo i have mocked divesgeester for his more than amorous statement made with respect to you, described accurately in the vernacular by GHOST HUNTER as 'a leg humping post'. It will go down in history as a momentous occasion.
Have you tried to mock anyone about their supposed sexual orientation on this thread?
Originally posted by FMFi am sorry its dive with the cult posts. its hard to tell you two apart
There has been similar schoolboy innuendo by posters like robbie and chaney3 on the Spirituality Forum, just like robbie's stuff here on this thread. I don't think I've mentioned robbie's religion on this thread ~ have I?
01 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe question was "Have you tried to mock anyone about their supposed sexual orientation on this thread?"
No i have mocked divesgeester for his more than amorous statement made with respect to you, described accurately in the vernacular by GHOST HUNTER as 'a leg humping post'. It will go down in history as a momentous occasion.
And your mumbling, fumbling, dissembling answer is "No..."?
How is this anything other than daft and unpleasant attempted comedy? π
Originally posted by FMFIts not mumbling either, it answers your question clearly and with reference. I suggest you suck it up.
The question was "Have you tried to mock anyone about their supposed sexual orientation on this thread?"
And your mumbling, fumbling, dissembling answer is "No..."?
How is this anything other than daft and unpleasant attempted comedy? π
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou don't even have the courage to acknowledge the calculatedly misanthropic nature of the "comedy" that you have been peddling. Aren't you a almost the same age as me? And you're trying to pass off your nastiness as "child like"? You really should be able to offer something better. Just saying. π
Its not mumbling either, it answers your question clearly and with reference. I suggest you suck it up.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby (Page 134)Footnote:
Saturday, January 30, 2016 (Page 134)
Notice:
Thanks for your 2,003 Replies during the past 44 days for an average of 45.5 replies
per day far exceeds the sole purpose of this thread which is now closed. ~GB
_________
“The man who kills a man kills a man.
The man who kills himself kills all men.
As far as he is concerned, he wipes out the world.”
βG.K. Chesterton
“Suicide is man's way of telling God, 'You can't fire me - I quit!”
βBill Maher
“When people kill themselves, they think they're ending the pain,
but all they're doing is passing it on to those they leave behind.”
βJeannette Walls
Originally posted by FMFwhat's the point in playing if you have no intention of getting better?
I have never made any claim whatsoever to be engaged in anything that could even remotely be described as "chess development." I am not "at some stage" of something. I am completely static, inert and not expanding in any way and don't think I have to any appreciable degree in my 900+ games. I may be a "bunny" but I am not moving through "stages" or "developing". So I am not a moving target ~ and therefore the "bashing" is made easier. π
Originally posted by FMFchange the hard done by act, no one is falling for it, apart from your parrot
You don't even have the courage to acknowledge the calculatedly misanthropic nature of the "comedy" that you have been peddling. Aren't you a almost the same age as me? And you're trying to pass off your nastiness as "child like"? You really should be able to offer something better. Just saying. π
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukesorry i don/t do conversations about favourite melons.
Ratings are a guide to a person's playing strength, but meaningless apart from that. (Not even comparable across chess sites).
I play chess to have a good game and a fun conversation. I think you would fail to deliver on the latter.
beating you would have been fun though