Memo

Originally posted by divegeester
Do you have a life outside of rhp like Startreader does, or it just her that is blessed with this temporal dynamic?

on holiday to wednesday
it's raining can't go riding so i will post away here instead.
having a nice lunch well as nice as the local harvester can provide.
i am currently reading "the chess mysteries of Sherlock Holmes" by Raymond Smullyan, a really good read, i suggest maybe you could get FMF a copy, would make a nice present for the 14th, might improve his game

Originally posted by FMF
Do you think robbie and GHOST HUNTER have been doing any taunting about supposed homosexuality on this thread at all?

there you go, using capitals against the female posters again
have you no respect

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
The women hater post, was my opinion about you and dive, every time any female posts its CAPITAL LETTERS as in shouting back to them, if i am wrong i am sorry, just looks that way to me.

"Every time"? Do you mean "CAPITAL LETTERS as in shouting" "every time" I address a post to Startreader or Suzianne and other women here? What makes you say this?

Originally posted by Startreader
Neither Robbie nor the Ghost Hunter taunted anyone about homosexuality, that I saw. There was a lot of good-humoured teasing about the apparent inseparability of you and divegester, since the two of you seem to post as a unit at times. No taunting about homosexuality per se.

But Divegeester has indeed posted extraordinary posts as close to adoration ...[text shortened]... ely to assume it is truthful fact.

It is not. It is an elaborate lie, but a lie nonetheless.

FMF busted again, his machinations are so transparent that I consider them an insult to our intelligence.

Originally posted by FMF
On page 117, after 6-7 pages of innuendo about homosexuality ~ marriage proposals, undying love, Valentine's Day etc. etc. by robbie and GHOST HUNTER [and goodness me, how many more pages have there been since?] you insisted that it was "fictitious" for me to claim that that was what they had been doing. Is that not going along with the attempted mockery about sexual orientation?

laser beams dude, divesgeester thinks that you emanate laser beams from your eyes, able to fry a post at just by looking at it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
FMF busted again, his machinations are so transparent that I consider them an insult to our intelligence.

Have you tried to mock anyone about their supposed sexual orientation on this thread?

Originally posted by FMF
Have you tried to mock anyone about their supposed sexual orientation on this thread?

Or other threads...

Originally posted by divegeester
Or other threads...

Or on the Spirituality Forum, for that matter.

Originally posted by Startreader
Neither Robbie nor the Ghost Hunter taunted anyone about homosexuality, that I saw.

It started on about page 90 of this thread and the puerile innuendo has been ever present for the subsequent 50-60 pages, but... - oh - wait, you say you haven't noticed it ~ and that if it is noticed then it's "fictitious" ~ and somehow it was, wait for it... "introduced" by me, is that what your current stance is?

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
key components in the debate?
the latest topic is, why are you and FMF so bad at chess?

Sir, your own rating is still sub 1600 and built mostly on 'bunny bashing'. (Average opponent rating 1318). Why the need to poke fun at peoples chess ability?!

That's just weak.

*Disclaimer. The term 'bunny bashing' used purely to demonstrate the discrepancy in rating in this context, not as an insult to lower rated players, who we have 'all' been at some stage in our chess development.

Originally posted by FMF
Or on the Spirituality Forum, for that matter.

what has anyones religion to do with the current topic?

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
what has anyones religion to do with the current topic?

It hasn't got anything to do with it; FMF was pointing to the forum where Robbie carrobie and chaney3 were previously making homophobic jibes.

Of course you know this and are trying to create a deflection, albeit a terribly weak one.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Disclaimer. The term 'bunny bashing' used purely to demonstrate the discrepancy in rating in this context, not as an insult to lower rated players, who we have 'all' been at some stage in our chess development.

I have never made any claim whatsoever to be engaged in anything that could even remotely be described as "chess development." I am not "at some stage" of something. I am completely static, inert and not expanding in any way and don't think I have to any appreciable degree in my 900+ games. I may be a "bunny" but I am not moving through "stages" or "developing". So I am not a moving target ~ and therefore the "bashing" is made easier. 😛

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
what has anyones religion to do with the current topic?

There has been similar schoolboy innuendo by posters like robbie and chaney3 on the Spirituality Forum, just like robbie's stuff here on this thread. I don't think I've mentioned robbie's religion on this thread ~ have I?

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Sir, your own rating is still sub 1600 and built mostly on 'bunny bashing'. (Average opponent rating 1318). Why the need to poke fun at peoples chess ability?!

That's just weak.

*Disclaimer. The term 'bunny bashing' used purely to demonstrate the discrepancy in rating in this context, not as an insult to lower rated players, who we have 'all' been at some stage in our chess development.

send over a challenge, see if you can back up your mouth
first 20 games on here, not many will play a p rated player.only other p raters seen to accept, not my fault i did beat GB twice, although they were unrated and i think he went easy on me.
i am not mocking them for a low rating, i am trying to help, i recommended a book and told them if they practiced more instead of stalking GB, they might improve.

i am curious, do you think the rating actually means something?.