05 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsLol.. Ok let's get this straight as to what your saying. So the word transfusion is in this scripture somewhere and it is liturally Jesus's blood and flesh that you've eaten and drank?
I just quoted one to you. Didn't you read it? Or perhaps you are too
stupid to understand it.
Please think on this for awhile before you dig yourself any deeper into a really deep pit of dumbness....
- Joined
- 15 Sep 04
- Moves
- 7051
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by galveston75You haven't once responded to my request to explain why the word 'abstain' should mean 'to refrain from any use whatsoever'. You repeatedly restate that these are the same but this does not qualify as logic in any sense. I suspect you don't even understand the thread of this argument because you seem to think I want to change the meaning of the text, find exceptions to the rule or challenge the necessity of obedience to God. None of these are true. I am in fact trying to uncover the true sense of the word 'abstain' in this context. You prove yourself completely uncooperative in this task.
Lol...Ok whatever you say. You're the expert and how dare me to use logic with you.
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by galveston75I said the word 'transfusion" is NOT in the Holy Bible. Isn't that the same
Lol.. Ok let's get this straight as to what your saying. So the word transfusion is in this scripture somewhere and it is liturally Jesus's blood and flesh that you've eaten and drank?
Please think on this for awhile before you dig yourself any deeper into a really deep pit of dumbness....
argument you give against the TRINITY. So to apply abstaining to mean
NO "transfusions" is not biblical because the word "transfusion" is not in
the Holy Bible. The Watchtower might want to change their NWT to put
this word in there. The point of my quoting the scripture where Christ
commands us to drink His BLOOD is to emphasis how you are taking
the abstaining from BLOOD out of the context and therefore apply the
saying from James in a way he could not have intended. But I guess you
still wish to remain ignorant and blind to the truth.
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by Conrau KI doubt if he has any idea what logic is. 😏
You haven't once responded to my request to explain why the word 'abstain' should mean 'to refrain from any use whatsoever'. You repeatedly restate that these are the same but this does not qualify as logic in any sense. I suspect you don't even understand the thread of this argument because you seem to think I want to change the meaning of the text, find e ...[text shortened]... ord 'abstain' in this context. You prove yourself completely uncooperative in this task.
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by Conrau KPoint blank question... What would abstain from fornication mean in your world?
You haven't once responded to my request to explain why the word 'abstain' should mean 'to refrain from any use whatsoever'. You repeatedly restate that these are the same but this does not qualify as logic in any sense. I suspect you don't even understand the thread of this argument because you seem to think I want to change the meaning of the text, find e ...[text shortened]... ord 'abstain' in this context. You prove yourself completely uncooperative in this task.
No long explinations that get blurry but in 10 words or less.
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat? I bet your dizzy from spinning this one up.
I said the word 'transfusion" is NOT in the Holy Bible. Isn't that the same
argument you give against the TRINITY. So to apply abstaining to mean
NO "transfusions" is not biblical because the word "transfusion" is not in
the Holy Bible. The Watchtower might want to change their NWT to put
this word in there. The point of my quoting the scripture wher ...[text shortened]... ot have intended. But I guess you
still wish to remain ignorant and blind to the truth.
Anyway I'll ask you the same qiestion, what does abstain from fornication mean in your spinning world?
- Joined
- 15 Sep 04
- Moves
- 7051
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by galveston75It would mean to not engage in fornication. I believe I have already said this at least twice now.
Point blank question... What would abstain from fornication mean in your world?
No long explinations that get blurry but in 10 words or less.
06 Dec 11
2 edits
Originally posted by Conrau KSo that would mean don't touch as in engage as you say, don't look as with pornography, don't do the act, don't do it in any form such as oral that an ex president seemed to make an excuse for, don't tell someone it's ok to do it, someone should be punished for doing it according to the Bible.
It would mean to not engage in fornication. I believe I have already said this at least twice now.
Am I wrong on any of this?
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by galveston75We were discussing the falacy of rejecting blood transfusions due to your
What? I bet your dizzy from spinning this one up.
Anyway I'll ask you the same qiestion, what does abstain from fornication mean in your spinning world?
warped interpretation and not fornication. Show us where the Holy Bible
says anything about blood transfusions and I might agree with you.
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsYou know I'm trying to make a point about the scripture in Acts. Please answer the question about fonication...
We were discussing the falacy of rejecting blood transfusions due to your
warped interpretation and not fornication. Show us where the Holy Bible
says anything about blood transfusions and I might agree with you.
06 Dec 11
Originally posted by Conrau KThanks and your right on your points.
No. The Greek pornos covers not merely illicit sexual intercourse but any immoral sexual activity, including masturbation which many cultures do not regard as morally significant.
Now going with that explination of abstain which would cover the many levels of fornication that we both mentioned which are many, how would the word absatin be viewed with strangled animals?