Spirituality
25 Jul 18
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeSo the inanimate atoms did not evolve into a single cell to start off with?
Please identify one person who believes, or has indicated, that inanimate objects like umbrellas evolve.
The exact opposite has been said.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
10 Aug 18
Originally posted by @proper-knobI guess the fact that you can copy and paste a wiki link clearly demonstrates that you know what you are talking about.
What would you expect to see ‘reproduced in a lab’?
That’s a substantial wiki page I linked, and yet you seemed to have read it and disseminated the content in 50mins?!
10 Aug 18
Originally posted by @proper-knobThe argument is what matters not the ideology.
Of course you do, he's a creationist like you.
This means innefective and harmful mutations can be passed along and accumulate from one generation to the next. And at some point along succeeding generational lines, whatever good changes that may have occurred would eventually be overwhemed by the accumulative toxic changes.
Can either of you substantiate this claim?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
10 Aug 18
Originally posted by @proper-knobBy your own admission you don’t have a clue what Kelly is on about, so there is that.
As per Kelly, you don't seem to understand how 'natural selection' works.
10 Aug 18
1 edit
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you ever offer more than a single sentence at any one time?
I guess the fact that you can copy and paste a wiki link clearly demonstrates that you know what you are talking about.
10 Aug 18
Originally posted by @kellyjayIs that a yes or no?
The argument is what matters not the ideology.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
10 Aug 18
Originally posted by @proper-knobYes. I do. 😉
Do you ever offer more than a single sentence at any one time?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @proper-knobYou still need a generation to start off with. Ponder on that for a while.
Of course you do, he's a creationist like you.
This means innefective and harmful mutations can be passed along and accumulate from one generation to the next. And at some point along succeeding generational lines, whatever good changes that may have occurred would eventually be overwhemed by the accumulative toxic changes.
Can either of you substantiate this claim?
10 Aug 18
1 edit
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWe’re talking about the diversification of life, not the origins of life. Keep up.
You still need a generation to start off with. Ponder on that for a while.
10 Aug 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIt's like talking with playdough.
So the inanimate atoms did not evolve into a single cell to start off with?
It really is.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
10 Aug 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeDodge noted.
It's like talking with playdough.
It really is.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIt’s not a dodge, it’s that the question is so utterly moronic and spectacularly dumb we can only hope you’re on the wind up.
Dodge noted.
10 Aug 18
Originally posted by @proper-knobI genuinely believe my IQ is compromised just by communicating with him.
It’s not a dodge, it’s that the question is so utterly moronic and spectacularly dumb we can only hope you’re on the wind up.