- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @fmfIn which thread on this Forum do you recommend having given your most effective replies to dj2becker's cross examination of where you ground your source of morality as an atheist? I see you complaining that you have done so and don't want to repeat it.
But my question to you is not about whether you feel disgruntled by how you fared in some previous discussion, my question to you is about the thread topic "Christian morals".
Where is one of the threads that you recommend to us to see where those rebuttals were best expressed.
Originally posted by @sonshipGo look for them yourself. dj2becker is one of the most tedious trolls in this community. I'm not the only person to have commented on it. You have never shown much interest in discussing morality aside from you spamming the forum with monologues and vast slabs of duckpeak dogma. You missed your chance. I have started dozens of threads on all aspects of morality and you've made yourself scarce. I gave dj2becker the time of day for about 6 months and then just got trolled for my trouble. I'm not interested in you grabbing hold of his coat tails.
In which thread on this Forum do you recommend having given your most effective replies to dj2becker's cross examination of where you ground your source of morality as an atheist? I see you complaining that you have done so and don't want to repeat it.
Where is one of the threads that you recommend to us to see where those rebuttals were best expressed.
Originally posted by @sonshipSo "Christian morals" = ordinary morals + believing in Jesus. Right?
[bMinus Jesus, there are moral codes of different types.
Minus Jesus even the Bible's commands are full of exhortations and commands many of which are not unique to the Judaic / Christian tradition.[/b]
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @fmfYou still at it?
So "Christian morals" = ordinary morals + believing in Jesus. Right?
Christian morals = Jesus Christ Himself.
This is pretty much what I have been explaining all along.
Now quickdraw, did you recommend on which thread in the last year, you feel you most successfully explained to dj2becker the basis of your concept of the source of moral standard to human beings?
It sound like you effective explained your opinion about the ground of morality when questioned about the objectively of a universal standard of moral oughtness. And you don't want to have to re-write your best rebuttal. Where is it?
Originally posted by @sonshipMorals govern human actions, and conduct, and behaviour ~ human interactions.
You still at it?
Christian morals = Jesus Christ Himself.
This is pretty much what I have been explaining all along.
Morals cannot EQUAL sonship, or EQUAL me, or EQUAL Jesus Christ.
Morals cannot EQUAL a person.
If what you mean is that "Christian morals" are human actions and interactions that people who believe in Jesus engage in, then what you "have been explaining all along" might make some sense. Distorting the meaning of regular English language words is sophistry.
Originally posted by @sonshipI have already responded to this. Are you pretending that you haven't read it?
Now quickdraw, did you recommend on which thread in the last year, you feel you most successfully explained to dj2becker the basis of your concept of the source of moral standard to human beings?
It sound like you effective explained your opinion about the ground of morality when questioned about the objectively of a universal standard of moral oughtness. And you don't want to have to re-write your best rebuttal. Where is it?
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @fmf
Go look for them yourself.
You write a lot. You can recommend one or two threads where you think you did a good job, can't you?
I'll ask someone else if you're reluctant.
dj2becker is one of the most tedious trolls in this community.
But you are not tedious ?
That is all an aside from the point.
If you did well in explaining about the grounding of objective morality Atheist style, recommend where you did your best job.
How do you know I won't agree with you ?
I don't mean I will agree that there is no God. But I may agree that you did produce a reasonable alternative to morality being grounded in someTHING other than a Moral Being of Supreme nature.
I'm not the only person to have commented on it. You have never shown much interest in discussing morality aside from you spamming the forum with monologues and vast slabs of duckpeak dogma. You missed your chance. I have started dozens of threads on all aspects of morality and you've made yourself scarce. I gave dj2becker the time of day for about 6 months and then just got trolled for my trouble. I'm not interested in you grabbing hold of his coat tails.
Yada, yada.
What's the name of the Thread where You really grounded human morality in some standard without God ?
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
02 Dec 17
d2jecker,
Be honest with me please. On which thread do you really think FMF gave his best reply to your examination of the grounding of his ultimate objective standard of morality OR his best explanation of totally relative morality?
I am not asking if you were left speechless. Just which one was a good try at an answer?
02 Dec 17
Originally posted by @sonshipYou're trolling.
d2jecker,
Be honest with me please. On which thread do you really think FMF gave his best reply to your examination of the grounding of his ultimate objective standard of morality OR his best explanation of totally relative morality?
I am not asking if you were left speechless. Just which one was a good try at an answer?
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @fmfYour evaluation of which direction I've gone is just too critical to me ... NOT.
You've gone downhill sonship in the last few years, that's for sure. Echoing dj2becker's trolling would once have been beneath you.
I understand that you want to hedge your bets and maybe not let yourself be pinned down to one thread.