anti-Christ

@fmf said
None of the stuff you have been saying about the nature of delusion is augmented or supported in any way by you now changing tack in this conversation and saying you need that pinch of salt with regard to the account given.

The 2 things have always run parallel. The veracity of Suzianne's actual posts and the embellished versions yourself and Dive have been circulating for years. (Which Suzianne has repeatedly said herself are inaccurate).

@ghost-of-a-duke said
The 2 things have always run parallel. The veracity of Suzianne's actual posts and the embellished versions yourself and Dive have been circulating for years. (Which Suzianne has repeatedly said herself are inaccurate).

The veracity of Suzianne's actual posts and the embellished versions yourself and Dive have been circulating for years.

I haven't "embellished" anything.

@fmf said
The veracity of Suzianne's actual posts and the embellished versions yourself and Dive have been circulating for years.

I haven't "embellished" anything.

Suzianne has said the version you are touting is inaccurate. This being the case, and the fact you are relying on your memory from 8-10 years ago, it is more likely than not you are indeed recounting an embellished version. (Perhaps you have even forgotten it was embellished).

As the events actually happened to Suzianne, I am minded to believe her when she says the accounts you vividly recall (from a decade ago) are inaccurate.

@ghost-of-a-duke said

And no, I do not think you paid Russ to have posters removed.

So in claiming that, was Suzianne lying or was she deluded?

@divegeester said
So in claiming that, was Suzianne lying or was she deluded?

I imagine she was expressing what she believed.

Welcome to the forums.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Suzianne has said the version you are touting is inaccurate. This being the case, and the fact you are relying on your memory from 8-10 years ago, it is more likely than not you are indeed recounting an embellished version. (Perhaps you have even forgotten it was embellished).

As the events actually happened to Suzianne, I am minded to believe her when she says the accounts you vividly recall (from a decade ago) are inaccurate.

Unless you are claiming that it is only my supposed embellishments that make her story sound like a delusion, I'm not sure what point you think you're making.

My particular telling of it makes it seem like it was, indeed, a delusion, is that what you mean?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Suzianne has said the version you are touting is inaccurate. This being the case, and the fact you are relying on your memory from 8-10 years ago, it is more likely than not you are indeed recounting an embellished version. (Perhaps you have even forgotten it was embellished).

As the events actually happened to Suzianne, I am minded to believe her when she says the accounts you vividly recall (from a decade ago) are inaccurate.

I am minded to believe her when she says the accounts you vividly recall (from a decade ago) are inaccurate

What you have been saying about the nature of delusion is not supported in any way by this new tactic of yours in our conversation.

@fmf said
Unless you are claiming that it is only my supposed embellishments that make her story sound like a delusion, I'm not sure what point you think you're making.

My particular telling of it makes it seem like it was, indeed, a delusion, is that what you mean?

I mean what I said. If you are indeed peddling an embellished version, what worth does it have? Suzianne has distanced herself from it, calling it inaccurate, and in so doing has rendered it quite meaningless.

We could all create strawmen, stand back and call them deluded.

@fmf said
I am minded to believe her when she says the accounts you vividly recall (from a decade ago) are inaccurate

What you have been saying about the nature of delusion is not supported in any way by this new tactic of yours in our conversation.

Nothing you have posted has verified your claims of delusion. (And to be blunt, you are deluded if you think otherwise).

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I mean what I said. If you are indeed peddling an embellished version, what worth does it have? Suzianne has distanced herself from it, calling it inaccurate, and in so doing has rendered it quite meaningless.

We could all create strawmen, stand back and call them deluded.

Are you saying that my version of the story makes it sound like she's deluded about having saved innumerable lives?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Nothing you have posted has verified your claims of delusion. (And to be blunt, you are deluded if you think otherwise).

I think the story about losing count of how many people were brought back from the dead using CPR is a delusion. Unless it was a fabrication. I choose to believe that she really believes it was true.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Nothing you have posted has verified your claims of delusion. (And to be blunt, you are deluded if you think otherwise).

And to be blunt, you are deluded if you think otherwise

This is an interesting new rhetorical tactic.

@fmf said
Are you saying that my version of the story makes it sound like she's deluded about having saved innumerable lives?

Suzianne has said your version is inaccurate. It's pointless therefore discussing something that nobody is claiming is factual.

You might as well incorporate Leprechauns into your narrative.

@fmf said
I think the story about losing count of how many people were brought back from the dead using CPR is a delusion. Unless it was a fabrication. I choose to believe that she really believes it was true.

I'm not sure I trust your vivid memory from 8-10 years ago, especially when it relates to events the person themself says are inaccurate.

@fmf said
And to be blunt, you are deluded if you think otherwise

This is an interesting new rhetorical tactic.

You sure do talk a lot about tactics. Perhaps you should deploy some yourself, rather than flapping about like a halibut.