11 Jun 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThey should have just signed it and then committed themselves to saving as many people as possible from the Nazis.
Attempts were made, with every possible and impossible means, to force them to sign a sworn statement, declaring that they no longer want to be Witnesses, that they will never again resume contact and association with the Witnesses, and that they will no longer read any literature from the Witnesses
11 Jun 14
Originally posted by FMFI was under the assumption that you were a Christian like me at one time?
Of course there's nothing wrong with lying to someone threatening to kill you or your family.
If that was true, you would have known that for those of us who love their
lives more than God are not worthy of God. It seems that what you had
was never at that level, which I suppose I should have known since you
walked away from it.
Kelly
Originally posted by googlefudgeThat is a very hard one for me. To take this out of the hypothetical I would
Hypothetical:
You are a Christian German in the late 1930's early 1940's.
You have Jews hidden in a secret basement.
The SS comes to your door and asks you if you have any Jewish people on the property.
You can:
A) Lie to them, and attempt to keep the Jewish people you are protecting from being rounded
up and taken to concentration camps ...[text shortened]... hiding.
Do try to explain how there is something wrong with lying in the above scenario.
suggest you read the "Hiding Place" by Corrie Ten Boom, she actually lived
that and wrote about. Some of her family told the truth, some lied, and she
wrote about what happen to each of them.
The issue I had with the discussion was about denying Christ to live. I would
not lie about that, and I would hope that no matter what I would never
deny Him for anything in this world.
Kelly
11 Jun 14
Originally posted by KellyJayMore likely, he considers lying to save your life not to be a violation of love for God.
If that was true, you would have known that for those of us who love their
lives more than God are not worthy of God.
Is your issue with lying in general, or with lying about your beliefs?
Is lying to save your ego OK? The sort of lying we see all the time on this forum.
11 Jun 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI answered it alright. Did you understand the answer?
you have failed to answer the question
I debate the girl, who didn't have her own right to decide about her life. Her parents wanted her dead for the sake of religion. The doctor however saved her, against her parents will. Who are the heroes in this story? Her parents? (no) Or the doctors? (yes).
I don't debate a general view about religion and free will. Then I go off-topic. This thread is not about the general case. This thread is about the girl.
And again I say: Religion kills.
Originally posted by KellyJayLike I said, dying ~ or letting your family die ~ because you did not want to lie to a murderer would be an unnecessary and meaningless death. The piece of paper on which the extorted signature was written would also be meaningless. Do you seriously think it would constitute a "denial" of your beliefs?
The issue I had with the discussion was about denying Christ to live. I would not lie about that, and I would hope that no matter what I would never
deny Him for anything in this world.
Originally posted by FabianFnasHere is something for you to understand and seeing that you could not bring yourself to acknowledge it, i shall tell you, some people are prepared to die for principles that they believe in making the assertion that life is more precious than religion quite erroneous, for to some people, its not, as I have ably demonstrated with reference. Now you can accept the FACT or dismiss it, either way, its true.
I answered it alright. Did you understand the answer?
I debate the girl, who didn't have her own right to decide about her life. Her parents wanted her dead for the sake of religion. The doctor however saved her, against her parents will. Who are the heroes in this story? Her parents? (no) Or the doctors? (yes).
I don't debate a general view about r ...[text shortened]... s not about the general case. This thread is about the girl.
And again I say: Religion kills.
and for the record 21 small children in the UK were given contaminated feed
Across nine hospitals, 21 babies have been struck down with blood poisoning brought on by an infection “strongly linked” to an intravenous fluid supplied by London-based pharmaceutical firm ITH Pharma.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/health/480826/Poisoned-baby-grieving-father-fears-for-other-children-St-Thomas-Hosptial
was it religion or medicine which killed Yousef Al-Kharboush
Originally posted by divegeesterIt's okay to give women's rights the freedom to murder their unborn child. But then it's not okay to not give their child a blood transfusion, and then be forced to have to? What happened to women's rights here?
Despite the Jehovah's Witness alleged position (repeatedly stated in this forum by robbie carrobie) of blood transfusions being "a matter of personal conscience", the real experience of life inside the cult is somewhat different as the religious pressure by the governing body to conform to its pernicious doctrines continues to endanger lives. In this Sou ...[text shortened]... ://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/kwazulu-natal/jehovah-s-witness-girl-saved-by-court-1.1700022
Originally posted by FMFLike I said, I would not deny Him for my life since He gave His life for me,
Like I said, dying ~ or letting your family die ~ because you did not want to lie to a murderer would be an unnecessary and meaningless death. The piece of paper on which the extorted signature was written would also be meaningless. Do you seriously think it would constitute a "denial" of your beliefs?
and He gave His life for my family too, so I hope my family feels the same
way. If you have nothing in your life you feel is more important than your
life, than you have nothing to compare that too.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayWhat exactly is achieved by telling a murderer 'the truth', and in so doing getting yourself murdered, and why would your God figure ~ who you claim knows your every thought ~ require your death in these circumstances?
Like I said, I would not deny Him for my life since He gave His life for me,
and He gave His life for my family too, so I hope my family feels the same
way. If you have nothing in your life you feel is more important than your
life, than you have nothing to compare that too.
Originally posted by KellyJayI would say that I feel the lives of my children and my wife are more important to me than my own. Would you lie about your religion (to somebody who broke into your house with the intent to murder) in order to save your wife and children?
If you have nothing in your life you feel is more important than your
life, than you have nothing to compare that too.
Originally posted by KellyJayAt no point in my Christian years would I have had a moment's hesitation lying about my faith to a murderer or rapist in order to stop a violent crime against me or anyone else. Saying to a person threatening to kill me [or anyone else] "I don't believe in God" in order to prevent the murder would not have actually meant that I didn't believe in God.
I was under the assumption that you were a Christian like me at one time? If that was true, you would have known that for those of us who love their lives more than God are not worthy of God.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOkay, thanks for the information.
Here is something for you to understand and seeing that you could not bring yourself to acknowledge it, i shall tell you, some people are prepared to die for principles that they believe in making the assertion that life is more precious than religion quite erroneous, for to some people, its not, as I have ably demonstrated with reference. Now you c ...[text shortened]... ther-children-St-Thomas-Hosptial
was it religion or medicine which killed Yousef Al-Kharboush
However, has this anything to do with the girl presented in the OP in the article link?
No? Then why do you think it is relevant?
To get back on-topic... On-topic it is.
You think it is okay to let a girl die because of the parents religion? I don't.
You think that the doctors did wrong by saving the girl back to life? I don't.
You think that one persons religion has precedence over another persons life? I don't.
If the girl wanted to die because of her religion, then it is her choice. But this girl didn't have the choice.
And again I repeat: Religion kills. And you think it's alright. I don't.