9am is too early.

9am is too early.

Spirituality

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @fmf
Seemingly not for people who observe Jesus' actions carefully. Your claim that getting drunk is "biblically unacceptable" in light of Jesus' own behaviour at Cana doesn't withstand scrutiny. Other superstitious beliefs you just so happen to hold based on the story are neither here nor there.
Your "scrutiny" you mean.

Not an issue for me. I know what the scriptures say and what they mean.

But don't worry over it too much. Someday you'll see. Be sure of it.

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
103312
11 Aug 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @secondson
Your "sound-light vibrations" are resonating. Seem to be turning black.

Got any more "Christian values" you wish to share?
I always have Christian values to share, dopey. Remember when Jesus turned over the tables of the money changers? Oh thats right...they weren't drunk. F***wit!!

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
103312
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @secondson
I'm still at a loss concerning what Jesus said to His mother.

"Woman, what have I to do with thee."

Interesting.
You're at a loss fullstop!! Quit while you're ahead!!

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
103312
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @secondson
Your "scrutiny" you mean.

Not an issue for me. I know what the scriptures say and what they mean.

But don't worry over it too much. Someday you'll see. Be sure of it.
You dont know what they mean and 'someday' wont come. You'll see.

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @suzianne
What "drunken guests"?

The scipture says nothing of "drunken guests".

Now you're just making stuff up.
Obviously FMF doesn't know what he's talking about, so he has to make stuff up like the good sophist he is.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @secondson
Your "scrutiny" you mean. .
Yes. This is a debate and discussion message board.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @suzianne
What "drunken guests"?

The scipture says nothing of "drunken guests".

Now you're just making stuff up.
The ones who had been drinking freely, so much so that the booze ran out.

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @karoly-aczel
You're at a loss fullstop!! Quit while you're ahead!!
Nothing substantive to contribute?

That's ok. At least you able to curse people.

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @fmf
Yes. This is a debate and discussion message board.
Are you sure about that?

I mean, when you make stuff up about a story in the Bible that's not part of the story it's not a discussion or a debate, it's presumptuous blibber blabber.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @secondson
Are you sure about that?.
Yes. Quite sure.

The question as to whether the story of the wedding at Cana depicts Jesus as demonstrating that getting drunk is "biblically unacceptable" is a reasonable thing to delve into a debate and discussion message board.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @secondson
I mean, when you make stuff up about a story in the Bible that's not part of the story it's not a discussion or a debate, it's presumptuous blibber blabber.
I haven't made stuff up. I am talking about the story.

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @fmf
The ones who had been drinking freely, so much so that the booze ran out.
You don't know how many people were there or even how much wine they had to start, nor do you seem cognizant of the fact that Jewish wedding feasts last a full week.

Two or three hundred people can drink a lot of wine with all the food they ate and no one would get drunk. You don't even know the alcohol content of the wine.

You're full of presumptuous speculations.

So far you've made zero substantive contribution to this discussion.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @secondson
You don't know how many people were there or even how much wine they had to start, nor do you seem cognizant of the fact that Jewish wedding feasts last a full week.

Two or three hundred people can drink a lot of wine with all the food they ate and no one would get drunk. You don't even know the alcohol content of the wine.

You're full of presumptuous speculations.

So far you've made zero substantive contribution to this discussion.
I think if Jesus wanted to demonstrate that getting drunk was "biblically unacceptable" then he wouldn't have taken the action that he is said to have taken at the wedding of Cana. You shouldn't get so het up about stuff like this. Encountering people with different perspectives is par for the course on a forum like this,

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @secondson
You don't know how many people were there or even how much wine they had to start, nor do you seem cognizant of the fact that Jewish wedding feasts last a full week.
Two or three hundred people can drink a lot of wine with all the food they ate and no one would get drunk. You don't even know the alcohol content of the wine.
If you think the people who had drunk all the booze available were sober, then that is your prerogative.

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28828
11 Aug 18

Originally posted by @karoly-aczel
Not my fault you cant understand simplicity. Or is it that you wont?
BTW get fu**** c*** face. You are below the scum that lives on the bottom of the ocean . Everytime you post you prove just who you are-a str8 up menace to spiritual understanding.
You have become a vile and foul-mouthed addition to this forum.

Shame on you.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.