Site Ideas
12 Jul 08
Originally posted by MctaytoI dont think that quoting of private forums is invasive of another's privacy itself. You may ask Russ to explain it.
You request the relevant TOS
You agree to not use the Service to:
Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous,[b] invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
It states you may not po ...[text shortened]... forum would be invasive to their privacy unless that persons permission (Author) was given.[/b]
Originally posted by KorchIt all depends on what your motive was for copying and pasting what you did? Also you have no way to know if what you copied and pasted was exactly what was said, as it comes from a 3rd party.
I dont think that quoting of private forums is [b]invasive of another's privacy itself. You may ask Russ to explain it.[/b]
Only I do not know what your motive was for doing so, perhaps you can enlighten us all as to what it was?
Originally posted by Very RustyI have already stated my motive - To unmask hypocrisy of Red Night & Nowakowski, which is not forbidden by TOS.
It all depends on what your motive was for copying and pasting what you did? Also you have no way to know if what you copied and pasted was exactly what was said, as it comes from a 3rd party.
Only I do not know what your motive was for doing so, perhaps you can enlighten us all as to what it was?
14 Sep 08
Originally posted by KorchA private forum is exclusive to it's membership. Any posting that takes place is between the members ans as such they frequently post things which they would never dream of posting in a public forum. Therefore it follows that on posting they would not expect their posts to be copied and posted on public forums thereby you have invaded there privacy.
I dont think that quoting of private forums is [b]invasive of another's privacy itself. You may ask Russ to explain it.[/b]
Originally posted by MctaytoAccording to your interpretation bannable is
A private forum is exclusive to it's membership. Any posting that takes place is between the members ans as such they frequently post things which they would never dream of posting in a public forum. Therefore it follows that on posting they would not expect their posts to be copied and posted on public forums thereby you have invaded there privacy.
1) talking in forums about content of PM;
2) talking in forums about content of club/clan forum.
I dont know about you but it seems nonsense for me.
If you have posted something in private forums you should take into account that some private forum member may talk in public about content of this forum. So there is 2 possible solutions:
1) not posting in private forums things which may disgrace you
2) accepting in clan/club only persons you trust for 100%.
Originally posted by KorchIt may seem nonsense to you but if you check with the mods you will discover that folk have ben banned for these reasons. Guess bye bye Korch 😀
According to your interpretation bannable is
1) talking in forums about content of PM;
2) talking in forums about content of club/clan forum.
I dont know about you but it seems nonsense for me.
If you have posted something in private forums you should take into account that some private forum member may talk in public about content of this forum. So th ...[text shortened]... orums things which may disgrace you
2) accepting in clan/club only persons you trust for 100%.
Originally posted by Very RustyActually from Nowakowski`s texts its obvious that he have personal issues. To say nothing about RN.
It sure looks like a personal attack on Nowakowski and Red Night who you seem to have a personal vendetta against.
But I agree that I dislike them too. Which does not change fact that both of them have showed themselves as hypocrites.