30 Jan 16
Originally posted by Landisqueen170Nothing is "automatically" faulty. What a daft notion. People either find faults with the thoughts you offer or they don't. You are perhaps trying to trivialize disagreement with you by suggesting that such disagreement is rooted in some sort of personal weakness on my part when the disagreements are about the thoughts.
What I will NOT do is defend and explain my thoughts to someone who just wishes to try and trivialize them or arrogantly question them as if they are automatically faulty.
How many countless thoughts have you offered that I have not expressed disagreement with? In such circumstances, you can't just simply try to dismiss disagreements as "automatic" when they do occur.
30 Jan 16
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou say this, and yet you never seem to confront what you may or may not see as "hatred" directly. It's a word that has little or no meaning coming from the keyboards (and copy pastes) of some posters here, including the likes of you and robbie who bandy it about. It would be interesting to hear you state unequivocally whether you have seen any "hatred" exhibited on this forum in, say, the last 48 hours, and how it manifested itself exactly.
My sentiments precisely.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by wolfgang59You can't find it, Wolfgang, because it's not there.
Where?
Can you show us that because I cannot find it.
The only people who've introduced homosexuality in this thread have been Divegeester and FMF. Robbie, Ghost Hunter and I were teasing them, in other words making light-hearted satirical comments about the way they are rarely apart. Where one is on the forum the other isn't far away. They back each other up in their different styles and those styles are almost always to the detriment of someone else.
Recent pages in the thread are copybook examples of how FMF controls a thread, guiding it tiny bit after tiny bit, introducing an idea so that after X number of pages the unwary reader will be believing others have said what they have not.
Go back many pages, and you'll see it develop. It's FMF's very own courtroom drama.
Originally posted by StartreaderActually I was asking about where the hypocrisy was,
You can't find it, Wolfgang, because it's not there.
The only people who've introduced homosexuality in this thread have been Divegeester and FMF. Robbie, Ghost Hunter and I were teasing them, in other words making light-hearted satirical comments about the way they are rarely apart. Where one is on the forum the other isn't far away. They back each ...[text shortened]... ave not.
Go back many pages, and you'll see it develop. It's FMF's very own courtroom drama.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by wolfgang59There's a great deal of hypocrisy from those two, inherent in what I described, but I think you're talking about the point where Landisqueen came in and identified hypocrisy from Divegeester. Can't stop now, busy day ahead, but maybe 3 or 4 pages or so back, I think. Look for Landisqueen's point of entry after I went to bed and you'll find it.
Actually I was asking about where the hypocrisy was,
Hope that helps.
so to sum up, it/s okay for dive to make comments towards women like "get in there" and "she fancies you" a totally sexist remark
after dives over the top post showing his admiration for FMF, i post "a bit early for valentines day"
i really must have hit a nerve by the over reaction, but that's what those two bullies specialise in.
they have posted other's names and know too many too post, who all disagree with me, none have bothered to post,
obviously FMF and dive are women haters, maybe tell landisqueen and startreader, to "stay in the kitchen"
homophobia, their current favourite word, the victim card when they have nothing left.
Originally posted by Startreaderas a women have you ever been offended by dive sexist comments?, the same dive who has a "thick skin" but goes in a mood when i mention valentines day.
There's a great deal of hypocrisy from those two, inherent in what I described, but I think you're talking about the point where Landisqueen came in and identified hypocrisy from Divegeester. Can't stop now, busy day ahead, but maybe 3 or 4 pages or so back, I think. Look for Landisqueen's point of entry after I went to bed and you'll find it.
Hope that helps.