30 Jan 16
Originally posted by Landisqueen170I'd be interested to hear what you think Grampy Bobby might make of his supporters' resort to personal remarks about divegeester's and my sexuality? Grampy has declined to answer, although he appeared to be against jokes about sexuality on page 104 of this thread. It's now unclear if he is still against them enough to comment on it a few pages later on the same thread.
Such hypocrisy.
Originally posted by Landisqueen170But you have now involved yourself in "these battles". I was not inclined to get involved in some barb-trading spat between you and divegeester whenever it happened, and yet you are here objecting to me objecting to homophobia. One could be forgiven for thinking your accusations of hypocrisy have a bit of a whiff of hypocrisy about them too.
I don't care to get involved in these battles. They are repetitive and negative and serve zero purpose from what I can tell.
Originally posted by Landisqueen170But you didn't want to tackle robbie et al. about what they said? Instead, here you are tackling me about something I didn't even say. This is surely you trying a bit too hard to land a partisan punch, no?
I don't agree with anyone being hateful towards another. Period.
Originally posted by FMFOh dear what have you to say about your friends blatant hypocrisy? Are you now distancing yourself from your friend? You ask other people to comment on what others have said all the time, now suddenly the cat has your tongue.
But you [b]have now involved yourself in "these battles". I was not inclined to get involved in some barb-trading spat between you and divegeester whenever it happened, and yet you are here objecting to me objecting to homophobia. One could be forgiven for thinking your accusations of hypocrisy have a bit of a whiff of hypocrisy about them too.[/b]
Originally posted by FMFWhy do you care? One might conclude you are slightly obsessed with GB. Give it a rest, with all due respect. You are an intelligent, articulate poster who often gives much food for thought...for the life of me, I cannot understand the amount of time and energy that you (and some others) spend on GB. Ignore him...he clearly drives you up a wall!
I'd be interested to hear what you think Grampy Bobby might make of his supporters' resort to personal remarks about divegeester's and my sexuality? Grampy has declined to answer, although he appeared to be against jokes about sexuality on page 104 of this thread. It's now unclear if he is still against them enough to comment on it a few pages later on the same thread.
Originally posted by FMFI simply noted that Dive insinuating what he did with me is exactly what Ghost has done with Dive. And Dive doesn't like it.
But you didn't want to tackle robbie et al. about what they said? Instead, here you are tackling me about something I didn't even say. This is surely you trying a bit too hard to land a partisan punch, no?
You remained silent when Dive was the accuser but vocal when he is the accused.
Originally posted by FMFUmmmm....no. lol
But you didn't want to tackle robbie et al. about what they said? Instead, here you are tackling me about something I didn't even say. This is surely you trying a bit too hard to land a partisan punch, no?
Interesting word choice. "Tackle." This connotates a fight of sorts.
I do not wish to "tackle" any one...perhaps you do. I prefer friendly, polite discussions...
Mine was just an observation, that's all. My opinion. You don't have to see it as I do.
Originally posted by Landisqueen170I think you should post whatever you want and confront whatever and whoever you want. Presumably you think I should too, right? Just about every single time you initiate an exchange with me it is in order to criticize me, and, with all due respect, I welcome this and do not advise you to give it a rest. I think you should continue to speak your mind ~ even if it is very frequently about me ~ and I think I should continue to speak my mind That all seem fair?
Give it a rest, with all due respect.
Originally posted by Landisqueen170You entered this thread (or re-entered perhaps) on the previous page clearly intent on tackling me. And so you should. I don't think you should be quibbling the word "tackle" though. That doesn't hold much water..
I do not wish to "tackle" any one...perhaps you do. I prefer friendly, polite discussions...
The post that was quoted here has been removedYour two cents seem hypocritical and entirely partisan, despite your protestations that you are "not involved". Like I said, you can hardly criticize me for saying nothing condemnatory about something "inappropriate" said to you, when you have said nothing condemnatory about something "inappropriate" said to me.