Go back
Memo

Memo

General

Landisqueen170

Joined
09 Feb 10
Moves
48636
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
I think you should post whatever you want and confront whatever and whoever you want. Presumably you think I should too, right? Just about every single time you initiate an exchange with me it is in order to criticize me, and, with all due respect, I welcome this and do not advise you to give it a rest. I think you should continue to speak your mind ~ even if it ...[text shortened]... is very frequently about me ~ and I think I should continue to speak my mind That all seem fair?
Hmmmmm....at face value....yes. But honestly, I do not see how I always criticize you. In the past, I have just reacted to your relentless questioning of my every a, an, the. lol

You always seemed to prefer to pick a fight with me...."tackle" my every thought. And I told you in the past, and here again tonight, that is just not my preference. No right or wrong here. I just found myself in constant defensive mode with you and it is not a pleasant way to converse. Others don't mind it...to each his/her own.

Landisqueen170

Joined
09 Feb 10
Moves
48636
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
Why have you piled in then to comment on the personal interactions between me and GHOST HUNTER, robbie, Startreader and Grampy Bobby if you claim to be "not involved" in these personal interactions?
I explained this....I related to one narrow aspect...that's all.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Jan 16
1 edit

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
You always seemed to prefer to pick a fight with me...."tackle" my every thought. And I told you in the past, and here again tonight, that is just not my preference.
But on this occasion you initiated this exchange and you decided to "pick a fight", right? You accept that, yes? I'd say it's certainly not the first time. We could look it up, but I'm not going to. It hardly matters.

As for tackling your "every thought". If we post "thoughts" we disagree with, we are surely going to disagree about them. If you disagree with my "every thought" then I think it would be perfectly understandable if you tackled them.

In fact you did. You arrived on this thread an hour so ago and decided to tackle me. And so you should if that's what you want to do. But you can hardly complain this time about picking fights when it was you who picked this one.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
I explained this....I related to one narrow aspect...that's all.
Whatever your justification for it is, it's been hypocritical of you, nevertheless.

Landisqueen170

Joined
09 Feb 10
Moves
48636
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
You entered this thread (or re-entered perhaps) on the previous page clearly intent on tackling me. And so you should. I don't think you should be quibbling the word "tackle" though. That doesn't hold much water..
That was not my intent.

It was just an observation on my part. Very ironic from my perspective.

No interest in debating the point. It is my opinion of what I see as hypocrisy and there is little sense in arguing...we will not change one another's minds 😉

Landisqueen170

Joined
09 Feb 10
Moves
48636
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
Whatever your justification for it is, it's been hypocritical of you, nevertheless.
You are entitled to see it that way 🙂
I am not the least bit surprised.

Well, carry on...don't let me spoil all of the fun here in this thread!

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Jan 16
1 edit

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
In the past, I have just reacted to your relentless questioning of my every a, an, the. lol
I have not questioned you about "every a, an, the." I have questioned you on things like for your "unconditional" support for the actions of US allies (like Turkey) in their military operations, about how you think people should just think about their own families and not worry about global issues, and on another occasion when you went on about how you preferred your husband to divegeester in terms of how they come across as Christians. Nothing about questioning you over "every a, an, the" at all.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
Well, carry on...don't let me spoil all of the fun here in this thread!
You have condemned divegeester and me explicitly for our behaviour in our interactions with robbie, GHOST HUNTER and Startreader on this thread, but you have chosen not to condemn robbie, GHOST HUNTER and Startreader for their behaviour in those interactions, and this is because you are not involved, have I summarized it correctly? 😉

Landisqueen170

Joined
09 Feb 10
Moves
48636
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
I have not questioned you about "every a, an, the." I have questioned you on things like for your "unconditional" support for the actions of US allies (like Turkey) in their military operations, about how you think people should just think about their own families and not worry about global issues, and on another occasion when you went on about how you preferred ...[text shortened]... ow they come across as Christians. Nothing about questioning you over "every a, an, the" at all.
You are right here. You have questioned me on all of those things. And there lies the problem. That is your style...you enjoy questioning people ...relentlessly. And some posters do not mind...that's great. I, for one, do. I prefer conversation....a give and take where two or more posters actually care what the others' insights, experiences might be....more of an "exchange of ideas..."





.

Landisqueen170

Joined
09 Feb 10
Moves
48636
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
You have condemned divegeester and me explicitly for our behaviour in our interactions with robbie, GHOST HUNTER and Startreader on this thread, but you have chosen not to condemn robbie, GHOST HUNTER and Startreader for their behaviour in those interactions, and this is because you are not involved, have I summarized it correctly? 😉
No, you did not. Surprise, surprise. lol

I did not condemn either of you. I pointed out a parallel that I saw as blatantly hypocritical. In my opinion. And it "involved" me....so I felt comfortable in doing so.

I also stated that I don't care for hateful comments from anyone.

I have no desire to entrench myself in the various squabbles that you are a part of...and I would think you might understand why.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
You are right here. You have questioned me on all of those things. And there lies the problem. That is your style...you enjoy questioning people ...relentlessly. And some posters do not mind...that's great. I, for one, do. I prefer conversation....a give and take where two or more posters actually care what the others' insights, experiences might be....more of an "exchange of ideas...".
Well what else would you say when you sometimes say things you seem to not have thought through and seem unable to defend or explain? On the 'forget the world, just worry about your kids' issue it immediately turned out that you had absolutely no exchange of "ideas" to offer on your suggestion, just immediate resort to 'leave me alone leave me alone' or words to that effect. No wonder you felt besieged. Just a thought. You should, of course, post whatever you want. 😀

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
I also stated that I don't care for hateful comments from anyone.
Were any of the remarks about homosexuality that adorned several pages of this thread "hateful comments"?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
I have no desire to entrench myself in the various squabbles that you are a part of...and I would think you might understand why.
But you clearly have intervened. You seem to be telling yourself you haven't.

Landisqueen170

Joined
09 Feb 10
Moves
48636
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by FMF
Well what else would you say when you sometimes say things you seem to not have thought through and seem unable to defend or explain? On the 'forget the world, just worry about your kids' issue it immediately turned out that you had absolutely no exchange of "ideas" to offer on your suggestion, just immediate resort to 'leave me alone leave me alone' or words to ...[text shortened]... . No wonder you felt besieged. Just a thought. You should, of course, post whatever you want. 😀
You conveniently failed to indicate the tone of that I comment I made months ago. Hmmm...just an oversight I'm sure? 🙂 It was CLEARLY tongue and cheek...I don't even have to go back and check because I am 100% certain that I had a smiley at the end of it to illustrate my lighthearted mindset when I posted it. And you know this.

And so, this is an example of what you do.

I will always defend and explain my thoughts when I feel as though there is mutual appreciation, consideration, openness, and respect.

What I will NOT do is defend and explain my thoughts to someone who just wishes to try and trivialize them or arrogantly question them as if they are automatically faulty.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
30 Jan 16

Originally posted by Kewpie
There are three kinds of people posting in this thread.
- One group are "intelligent and articulate". Their posts are worth reading.
- Another group are seemingly devoted to school-age taunting, with an apparent inability to read let alone understand the posts of the first group.
- The third group mostly lurk, watching the other two groups with amazement ...[text shortened]... will do.

{edit} disclaimer: not in response to any particular individual post in this thread.
Great post. 🙂

But you've just put yourself in the "intelligent and articulate" camp! 😉

I must admit I visit this thread often, a guilty pleasure, like watching Coronation Street.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.