Sunday afternoon lynchings

Originally posted by FMF
I am saying that they are both morally reprehensible actions ~ the JW child sacrifice certainly being rooted in religious conviction ~ and the lynchings apparently/possibly rooted in religious conviction. That they are both morally reprehensible actions is the commonality, not the details of the unnecessary death involved.

Yes but so is spray painting a swastika on a Jewish temple, is that therefore the same thing as lynching a man after a Sunday service? If not then your comparison with the right to self determination and lynchings makes no sense. Simply both being morally reprehensible is neither here nor there. Is it?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
the i retract it and say that i have no way of knowing what extent his hatred takes simply that he appears to me to be hateful.

You retract it after 8 pages?

Originally posted by FMF
You retract it after 8 pages?

what is it about I retract it that you fail to understand?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yes but so is spray painting a swastika on a Jewish temple, is that therefore the same thing as lynching a man after a Sunday service?

No they are not "the same". Religiously motivated JW child sacrifice and religiously motivated lynchings have two things in common [1] they are morally reprehensible and [2] they result in deaths. Spray painting a swastika on a Jewish temple qualifies for [1].

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what is it about I retract it that you fail to understand?

I wonder why you didn't retract it immediately on page 2. Why did you wait 6 pages? It's interesting behaviour on your part.

Originally posted by FMF
No they are not "the same". Religiously motivated JW child sacrifice and religiously motivated lynchings have two things in common [1] they are morally reprehensible and [2] they result in deaths. Spray painting a swastika on a Jewish temple qualifies for [1].

If they are not the same then the comparison is not justified. Being morally reprehensible is neither here nor there and resulting in death is neither here nor there, suicide results in death its not the same as murder, is it.

Originally posted by FMF
I wonder why you didn't retract it immediately on page 2. Why did you wait 6 pages? It's interesting behaviour on your part.

Obviously my life is more interesting than yours.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
If not then your comparison with the right to self determination and lynchings makes no sense. Simply both being morally reprehensible is neither here nor there. Is it?

Innocent people die in both cases.

Originally posted by FMF
Innocent people die in both cases.

Innocent people die in aeroplane crashes its not the same as lynching a man on Sunday afternoons or someone dying by refusing an intravenous blood transfusion.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why would a disability stop me.

It doesn't matter. You're just trolling aren't you?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Innocent people die in aeroplane crashes its not the same as lynching a man on Sunday afternoons or someone dying by refusing an intravenous blood transfusion.

The deaths resulting from lynchings and JW child sacrifices are not accidents. Aeroplane crashes aren't caused by religious convictions nor ~ usually ~ by morally reprehensible actions.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
It doesn't matter. You're just trolling aren't you?

This thread was deliberately derailed by dweebjeester when he spitefully attempted to make a comparison between the moral reprehensibility of refusing intravenous blood transfusions and attempting to state that I should shut up about Christians lynching people on Sunday afternoons on that basis. If you want to blame anyone, i suggest you blame him.

Originally posted by FMF
The deaths resulting from lynchings and JW child sacrifices are not accidents. Aeroplane crashes aren't caused by religious convictions nor ~ usually ~ by morally reprehensible actions.

What about deaths resulting from intravenous blood transfusions, are they morally reprehensible the same as lynching a man on Sunday is morally reprehensible?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
This thread was deliberately derailed by dweebjeester when he spitefully attempted to make a comparison between the moral reprehensibility of refusing intravenous blood transfusions and attempting to state that I should shut up about Christians lynching people of Sunday afternoons on that basis. If you want to blame anyone, i suggest you blame him.

I think the thread is about morally reprehensible actions being rooted in religious convictions.

Originally posted by FMF
I think the thread is about morally reprehensible actions being rooted in religious convictions.

the thread is about Christians lynching people after listening to a sermon on Sunday afternoon.