Incomes relative to Religions in USA.

Originally posted by FMF
I looked at the transcripts as you suggested. I agree with the court's decision. I don't need to change your mind about the court's decision.

again you have failed to demonstrate how you came to that conclusion, are we simply meant to believe you without the slightest shred of evidence, surely it would be an easy thing to provide an extract from the court transcripts. I did it, why cant you.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i have already stated that he was guilty of abuse, again please explain why waiting until after considering the evidence that terming the abuse alleged is defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said and until you do will ask the question again and again and again.

Not even Jehovah's Witness brother Kendrick himself thinks his sexual molestation of children is "alleged abuse"; it's just you. What is your reason for referring it to as "alleged" when not even the perpetrator reckons it's "alleged"? tell me, if you decide that it didn't happen, are you going to contact Kendrick and urge him to start denying it happened?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
again you have failed to demonstrate how you came to that conclusion...

I looked at the transcripts, as you suggested.

Originally posted by FMF
Not even Jehovah's Witness brother Kendrick himself thinks his sexual molestation of children is "alleged abuse"; it's just you. What is your reason for referring it to as "alleged" when not even the perpetrator reckons it's "alleged"? tell me, if you decide that it didn't happen, are you going to contact Kendrick and urge him to start denying it happened?

why is waiting to consider the evidence and terming anything in connection with the trial including the abuse defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said. again, why is waiting to consider the evidence and terming the accusation of abuse, alleged, defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said.

Originally posted by FMF
I looked at the transcripts, as you suggested.

yawn you have provided nothing nor can you to substantiate your claim that you came to the same conclusion after considering the evidence, i simply don't believe you did and are lying, if you provide specific evidence to the contrary i will withdraw the statement, otherwise, its stands.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why is waiting to consider the evidence and terming anything in connection with the trial including the abuse defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said. again, why is waiting to consider the evidence and terming the accusation of abuse, alleged, defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said.

Not even Kendrick, sexual molester and Jehovah's Witness brother, thinks his sexual molestation of children is "alleged abuse". Do you think he should still be "waiting to consider the evidence" against him, including his own confessions? Not even the JWs call it "alleged abuse". It's just you who is calling it "alleged abuse". People will make of it what they will.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yawn you have provided nothing nor can you to substantiate your claim that you came to the same conclusion after considering the evidence, i simply don't believe you did and are lying, if you provide specific evidence to the contrary i will withdraw the statement, otherwise, its stands.

It's for you to decide whether you agree with the verdict or not, robbie. You don't need to worry about me coming to the same conclusion as the court.

Originally posted by FMF
Not even Kendrick, sexual molester and Jehovah's Witness brother, thinks his sexual molestation of children is "alleged abuse". Do you think he should still be "waiting to consider the evidence" against him, including his own confessions? Not even the JWs call it "alleged abuse". It's just you who is calling it "alleged abuse". People will make of it what they will.

why is terming the abuse alleged until considering the evidence defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said, please answer the question. Vain appeals to the gallery will not help you FMF, bu maybe someone will slip you a get out of jail free card.

Originally posted by FMF
It's for you to decide whether you agree with the verdict or not, robbie. You don't need to worry about me coming to the same conclusion as the court.

I simply don't believe you came to the same conclusion after considering the evidence, for if you had you could provide at least a smattering of details instead of the center of the worlds largest doughnut.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why is terming the abuse alleged until considering the evidence defending the perpetrator over the victim,you have not said, please answer the question.

You said "no one disputed the abuse, no one disputes that Kendrick was guilty" and yet when confronted about Kendrick's "regrettable action" you insisted that it was only "alleged abuse".

Originally posted by FMF
You said "no one disputed the abuse, no one disputes that Kendrick was guilty" and yet when confronted about Kendrick's "regrettable action" you insisted that it was only "alleged abuse".

why is terming the abuse alleged until considering the evidence defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said, please answer the question.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I simply don't believe you came to the same conclusion after considering the evidence, for if you had you could provide at least a smattering of details instead of the center of the worlds largest doughnut.

You don't have to believe me. You don't have to agree with me. You don't have to agree with the court.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why is terming the abuse alleged until considering the evidence defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said, please answer the question.

Robbie, you claimed "no one disputed the abuse, no one disputes that Kendrick was guilty" and yet yet it was you who insisted that it was only "alleged abuse" which suggests that you were not yet convinced that Kendrick was guilty.

Originally posted by FMF
You don't have to believe me. You don't have to agree with me. You don't have to agree with the court.

I dont believe you, i dont agree with you and i cannot find one shred of evidence that
the congregation was guilty of negligence and thus complicit with the abuse and neither
can you, evidently.

Originally posted by FMF
Robbie, you claimed "no one disputed the abuse, no one disputes that Kendrick was guilty" and yet yet it was you who insisted that it was only "alleged abuse" which suggests that you were not yet convinced that Kendrick was guilty.

why is terming the abuse alleged until considering the evidence defending the perpetrator over the victim, you have not said, please answer the question.