Originally posted by FMFYou were present at the time.
I know nothing about it. You have been talking to the moderators about why they banned a poster? And yet you didn't mention that you also want certain posters banned? This seems a bit odd.
You are either remarkably obtuse and intellectually challenged or so totally self-absorbed, except when in the presence of Tweedledee, that you fail to notice and interpret even quite obvious forum happenings.
I incline towards the latter view.
29 Jan 16
Originally posted by StartreaderI am not aware of what or whom you're referring to. Perhaps there was a post that I did not read thoroughly? If you don't want to explain in public, send me a PM by all means, and if you are right and I have forgotten something, then I will acknowledge it publicly without revealing what you told me. Up to you.
You were present at the time.
29 Jan 16
Originally posted by StartreaderYou think I might be "intellectually challenged" but are inclined towards something or other to do with "Tweedledee" instead? π
You were present at the time.
You are either remarkably obtuse and intellectually challenged or so totally self-absorbed, except when in the presence of Tweedledee, that you fail to notice and interpret even quite obvious forum happenings.
I incline towards the latter view.
Originally posted by StartreaderWouldn't you have shown some of the "considerable original thought" you mentioned on page 89 if you'd Googled the words "intellectually challenged" and then copy pasted some quotations containing those words here, taking care not to address the post to me directly?
Evidently you're intellectually challenged as well....
29 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFSo you actually go all the way back to find page numbers of a post 18 pages or so ago? And then you fail even to understand that short passage of text. How sad.
Wouldn't you have shown some of the "considerable original thought" you mentioned on page 89 if you'd Googled the words "intellectually challenged" and then copy pasted some quotations containing those words here, taking care not to address the post to me directly?
And no, I'm not going to help you out here.
29 Jan 16
Originally posted by StartreaderIf you and Ghost Hunter could get together and see if you can figure out between you what the real issue is here it would save us a lot of explainations.
And yet you are apparently perfectly happy for your best friend FMF to quote your friend's name openly in this thread, and then to justify it by whining that FMF had done it first, which, as every teacher knows and every erstwhile schoolchild remembers is the cry of the pathetic and guilty. Passive aggression in action.
Originally posted by StartreaderNo it isn't you silly person. Using a RHP posters real name is.
On the contrary, actually using a person's name is explicitly against the site's TOS...
Peter Newman is not a member of this site. Are you really as dense as you seem to be pretending to be?