Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWere Startreader and GHOST HUNTER talking about me "harassing" you for your "sexuality", Grampy Bobby? No. They weren't. Your copy past about "clear language" and "insincerity" is just yet another ironic moment coughed up by your dyed-in-the-wool hypocrisy. 😉
"The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink." George Orwell (Politics and the English Language)
Originally posted by FMFNo.
Might this not be a topic for a new thread, Grampy Bobby?
This is brilliant.
Every time there is a new topic to debate, a new game, a list ... anything
we just put it in this thread. Keep things nice and simple ONE THREAD.
Hell we might as well close down the other forums as well!
29 Jan 16
Originally posted by StartreaderIt means animals react to stuff, like "I like this" or "I don't like this"
What on earth does that mean?
while humans have the capability of analyzing, of asking and
understanding "why do I like this?" or "what does this mean?"
Then there are chemical components, which simply react in a
linear, predictable manner.
I'll bring my crayons.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWould you show your mother your RHP posts evidencing your
Would you speak or email these words to your sister or aunt or wife or the wife of a husband with whom you are friends?
Haven't your parents taught you politeness, etiquette and common courtesies? What in the hell is wrong with you?
unchristian behavior and passive aggressive pathology?
Originally posted by FMFi don't think it's a laugh, far from it.just find it curious why you follow GB around telling everyone his posts actually have another meaning, surely the writer knows what they mean.
As I have suggested previously, you seem to have no idea ~ or you're pretending not to understand ~ what the criticisms being levelled at the poster you are defending actually are. Then again, you are perfectly entitled to get your laughs in whatever way you choose.
Keep saying i don't know what i am talking about over and over well that's just lame, just proves you have no proof that GB is the nasty person you paint him to be.i honestly thought you would be better than that.
i for one see no reason why you should be banned, others reading your nonesense will be punishment enough for you.
Originally posted by GHOST HUNTERWhen you say stuff like "I am not defending GB, just wondering why you get so annoyed by GB doing some copy and pasting", it clearly shows that either [1] you simply have no idea about the nature or substance of the criticisms that are being levelled at him, or [2] you do know, and the straw man insinuating that it is merely a matter of "some copy and pasting" is you - quite deliberately - trying to deflect from the unanswered criticisms in question.
Keep saying i don't know what i am talking about over and over well that's just lame...
It seems to me you are either being clueless, or you are being devious. I plump for the former, which is the more charitable interpretation.
Originally posted by FMFAgain you make allegations without any proof to back it up.two reasons
When you say stuff like "I am not defending GB, just wondering why you get so annoyed by GB doing some copy and pasting", it clearly shows that either [1] you simply have no idea about the nature or substance of the criticisms that are being levelled at him, or [2] you [b]do know, and the straw man insinuating that it is merely a matter of "some copy and pa ...[text shortened]... , or you are being devious. I plump for the former, which is the more charitable interpretation.[/b]
1] you have some sort of amazing gift, only you can see the aggression in harmless copy and paste posts by GB.
2] you don't like GB because he's a popular well liked member on here.
the candle does attract moths does it not?
Again, GB originally posted he would not re-new his sub, not his fault a kind member bought him one, secondly he said he would not start any new threads, which is also true.
But you continually bring up an incident which was sorted by the moderator,as posts were removed i can't comment on who said what, so i admit being clueless there, but i have seen nothing GB has done to warrant the stream of negative posts in his direction, most i hope are tongue-in-cheek, but only the writer of the post knows for certain what they are actually meaning.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29263
Originally posted by GHOST HUNTERCome sir, that's a bit below the belt. You may have had a few online disagreements with Dive but that's not enough basis to determine he has led a friendless existence. I suspect he has been a very good friend to a great many people, as I'm sure you have yourself. An on-line persona has no significant bearing on who we are as a person or the relationships we have had off-site.
Firstly i find it hard to believe that dive [b]EVER had a friend...[/b]
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120169
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThe case is not closed, it has been raised with the moderator who by now will have taken appropriate action.
For the record and on my dear mother's gravesite in Massachusetts,
I swear that "Robert Frost" is/was the only name I noticed on "page 8" of this thread
created by lemon lime. ~Bob
Footnote: The reference to "Robert Frost" was posted to this thread at 2:19am today.
This public forum is provided for conversation not litigation. Case closed.
Why you feel the need to swear on the body of a dead relative about this absolutely astonishing, distasteful and actually quite unnecessary.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120169
29 Jan 16
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI find it ironic and amusing that you, the poster who incessantly pontificates about forum guidelines, is the one poster continuously failing to abide by them and finding yourself repeatedly in hot water with the moderators.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby Thread 167234
"If you're tempted to post an immediate Thumbs Down in reaction to the following statements authorized by the Sole Proprietor of Red Hot Pawn, it's your prerogative to do so. However, the questions you must eventually ask yourself are, "Then whose authority do I accept? My likemind ...[text shortened]... validity of the points being made." [i]~Russ
___________
Timely thread, Kewpie. Thanks."
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukehardly below the belt, i find it hard to believe any one so obnoxious who makes all sort of accusations, without any proof likely to have any real friends.
Come sir, that's a bit below the belt. You may have had a few online disagreements with Dive but that's not enough basis to determine he has led a friendless existence. I suspect he has been a very good friend to a great many people, as I'm sure you have yourself. An on-line persona has no significant bearing on who we are as a person or the relationships we have had off-site.