13 Apr 15
Originally posted by divegeesterI have not failed in anything, its still a matter of wonderment to me how you can go to church and come out after the service and lynch people, mutilate them, invite your family and friends to watch and send postcards about it. your obligatory attempt to reduce it to a personal level was simply aside show, i merely humoured you.
I see you are pretty quickly down-shifting into your playground name changing tactic. I suspect you already realise you have made an epic fail in this thread.
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you ever wonder why no one takes you seriously here at RHP?
All he has to do is provide evidence of his compassion and love and tolerance.
You start a long-winded thread about the horrors of last centrury lynchings in America, you even reference it. Then you immediately use these horror to take a swipe at what you called "normal Christianity", then when challenged you accuse me of being as bad as the people doing the lynchings.
Do you ever stop, take a breath and consider what you are posting? Or do you just not care?
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre you drunk on your home brew?
I have not failed in anything, its still a matter of wonderment to me how you can go to church and come out after the service and lynch people, mutilate them, invite your family and friends to watch and send postcards about it.
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by FMFhis attempt to state that we are more morally culpable and reprehensible because of our stance on blood transfusions is motivated by hatred. He knows that in the case of minors its an extremely emotive subject and he will utilise that in an attempt to either draw attention way from the issue that i raised or attempt to discredit it me in some other way. He did after all state that I would let a child die, did he not? Does that appear to you to be a man possessed of compassion and understanding? Well you will provide evidence of his compassion and understanding and I will accept it, So far you seem unable to do so.
What evidence do you have that he is "equally as hateful" as people who strung up blacks by their necks to murder them?
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by FMFHe made the comparison between out stance on blood and minors and the 4000 persons who were mutilated and lynched stating that we were more morally reprehensible. That is the second or third time i have told you i will not do so again.
How is divegeester "winning 4000 persons mutilated and lynched to nil"?
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnd yet you used the emotive subject of last centrury lynchings to take a swipe at "normal Christianity". I'm just pointing out that your religion in full of horrible issues now.
his attempt to state that we are more morally culpable and reprehensible because of our stance on blood transfusions is motivated by hatred. He knows that in the case of minors its an extremely emotive subject and he will utilise that in an attempt to either draw attention way from the issue that i raised or attempt to discredit it me in some other ...[text shortened]... dence of his compassion and understanding and I will accept it, So far you seem unable to do so.
13 Apr 15
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhere did I say JWs were "more morally reprehensible"?
He made the comparison between out stance on blood and minors and the 4000 persons who were mutilated and lynched stating that we were more morally reprehensible. That is the second or third time i have told you i will not do so again.
13 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut divegeester has not lynched or mutilated anyone. Where do you get the "4,000" from?
He made the comparison between out stance on blood and minors and the 4000 persons who were mutilated and lynched stating that we were more morally reprehensible.