17 Sep 14
Originally posted by galveston75I have followed it with interest. There is nothing in the Bible about "the dangers of blood transfusions". Which passages do you think substantiate your claim?
Really? You have not been paying attention. Look back at this forum as I'm not going to repeat it.
Originally posted by galveston75oh dear has the windy scourgebag blown in with his usual gusto? lets hope his balloon head bursts and he self perpetuates away again.
My already answering you is not evading. It's you not understanding or not wanting to. Gotta go to work......
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120150
17 Sep 14
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75FMF is asking you if [your version of] Jehovah would be pleased or displeased if a child died because the parents had withheld a blood transfusion?
Sorry but that is my answer to your question.
It's an excellent question and one which if you are confident in your doctrine on this matter, should feel more than comfortable answering succinctly.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120150
17 Sep 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieFMF is asking if [your version of] Jehovah would be pleased or displeased if a child died because the parents had withheld a blood transfusion?
oh dear has the windy scourgebag blown in with his usual gusto? lets hope his balloon head bursts and he self perpetuates away again.
It's an excellent question and one which if you are confident in your doctrine on this matter, should feel more than comfortable answering succinctly.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120150
18 Sep 14
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75I've a answered it. Everyone else has probably lost the will to live. I do notice however that you are avoiding FMF's question. As I've answered you, will answer this:
I find it sad that all the Christians here at RHP are avoiding the question I asked about feeding your child blood to keep them alive. It's clearly a puzzling question and one that would expose the tranfusion issue as being also wrong.
Perhaps the point has been made.
Would [your version of] Jehovah would be pleased or displeased if a child died because the parents had withheld a blood transfusion?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120150
18 Sep 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDidn't you once say that whether or not a JWs receives a blood transfusion is a "matter of personal conscience"?
oh dear has the windy scourgebag blown in with his usual gusto? lets hope his balloon head bursts and he self perpetuates away again.
So why the big deal about prohibiting it?
Same question to Galveston75
18 Sep 14
Originally posted by galveston75probably missed this among your other attempts to divert the discussion.
I find it sad that all the Christians here at RHP are avoiding the question I asked about feeding your child blood to keep them alive. It's clearly a puzzling question and one that would expose the tranfusion issue as being also wrong.
Perhaps the point has been made.
i will answer it just so you don't get the false impression you "got us".
yes, if there is a proven medical benefit, i would feed blood to children, adults, cats. i would do that even if the benefit is mild.
medicine doesn't have to be pretty and delicious. it has to prevent death and ideally to improve a patient life.
we do radiotherapy, chemotherapy for cancer patients. in the overwhelming majority of those cases, the patients would die otherwise. we give them what is essentially poison and you whine about giving another human something far more bening, a blood transfusion.