anti-Christ

@suzianne said
Very funny, because by saying this, you show that YOU are a liar.

How so? LOL

Your claims about yourself and the owner of this site accepting bribes to remove other posters are unilaterally incredulous.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Don't forget about your uncanny superpower to detect pathological liars.

It empowers you to accuse whoever you like without any fear of being wrong.

I’ve said no such thing.

@divegeester said
I’ve said no such thing.

Are you suggesting it was embellished?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Are you suggesting it was embellished?

Oh dear…

I’ve not embellished anything.
You are pretending I have despite your claims (which btw I believe are lies) that you haven’t seen the original claims by Suzianne. So how can you even know!?

@divegeester said
Oh dear…

I’ve not embellished anything.
You are pretending I have despite your claims (which btw I believe are lies) that you haven’t seen the original claims by Suzianne. So how can you even know!?

FMF said some of the claims precede my arrival on the site, going back 8-10 years.

Is FMF lying?

@divegeester said
Oh dear…

I’ve not embellished anything.
You are pretending I have despite your claims (which btw I believe are lies) that you haven’t seen the original claims by Suzianne. So how can you even know!?

He asked if you are suggesting it was embellished, not that it WAS embellished. Which I can definitely say that it was (embellished).

"So how can you even know!?"
He was just asking you a question, to clarify what you just said.

You know, because your statement that you haven't embellished anything is a blatant lie. And how can I know? I made the original statement that you later embellished.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
FMF said some of the claims precede my arrival on the site, going back 8-10 years.

Is FMF lying?

Of course not, unlike yourself he is a poster of credibility and principle. But that doesn’t mean he was referring to the post I was referring to.

If you didn’t see the claims, then you cannot say my account of them is embellished. So you’re just believing the pathological liar Suzianne whom you have, some three years or so ago foolishly nailed your loyalty too.

@suzianne said
He asked if you are suggesting it was embellished, not that it WAS embellished. Which I can definitely say that it was (embellished).

"So how can you even know!?"
He was just asking you a question, to clarify what you just said.

You know, because your statement that you haven't embellished anything is a blatant lie. And how can I know? I made the original statement that you later embellished.

Ok supergirl; tell me exactly, precisely what I have repeated about you which is embellished?

@divegeester said
Ok supergirl; tell me exactly, precisely what I have repeated about you which is embellished?

Let's go with the easiest.

I've never used the word "countless" on this website. Your claim that I did is an embellishment directly from your own psyche.

@suzianne said
Let's go with the easiest.

I've never used the word "countless" on this website. Your claim that I did is an embellishment directly from your own psyche.

Ah, there you are…

Yes you have you claimed that you have saved “countless” lives on the streets of Phoenix and you claimed you have crashed sexual molesters through “countless” bar tables.

Is this really the only “embellishment” you can come up with?

@suzianne said
Look again.

My post, that you are replying to here, is TO @divegeester ABOUT @ghost-of-a-duke.

What I said was, "It's not difficult to know at all. He doesn't buy my angel story because he doesn't believe in God." He, speaking to @divegeester about @ghost-of-a-duke. Right after @divegeester said to @ghost-of-a-duke:

@divegeester said
As I said, “most” of her ...[text shortened]... you really don’t believe when you are too busy white-knighting 🙂

Stop misrepresenting me.

You claimed that divegeester doesn't "buy" your angel story because he doesn't believe in God. This seems very narcissistic of you. So, he has to accept your delusional story in order to demonstrate to you that he believes in God? Gosh.

@mlb62 said
yes, I've heard Gavin Newsom is just like the Bible described him.

Out of curiosity, exactly how do you define an "anti-Christ" leaving out people here or there, just the term, what does it mean?

@kellyjay said
Out of curiosity, exactly how do you define an "anti-Christ" leaving out people here or there, just the term, what does it mean?

Maybe, like I do for you, I embody what it is to be an "Anti-Christ"?

I have capitalized the word "Anti" because that's what you have done on many of the dozens of occasions when you have used the term to refer to me.

@divegeester said
Ah, there you are…

Yes you have you claimed that you have saved “countless” lives on the streets of Phoenix and you claimed you have crashed sexual molesters through “countless” bar tables.

Is this really the only “embellishment” you can come up with?

No, I did not.

It is entirely your own embellishment.

@fmf said
You claimed that divegeester doesn't "buy" your angel story because he doesn't believe in God. This seems very narcissistic of you. So, he has to accept your delusional story in order to demonstrate to you that he believes in God? Gosh.

I did not. Stop lying.

I said he. I was talking TO @divegeester ABOUT @ghost-of-a-duke.

What about this don't you get?