@metal-brain saidI have never (yes, never ) read anything you've posted that is even remotely correct. You are always, always wrong. At first, like some generous people here, I thought you were just trolling, because no one can be 100% wrong 100% of the time. But, no, you actually are. No matter the subject, you can be reliably counted on to be wrong about it. ALL THE TIME. You're like a freak of nature or something; you completely defy natural odds.
Does mindless trolling make you feel smart?
You don't seem to offer anything to this forum at all. Nothing intellectual, just ad homenum attacks heavily laced with insults. Do you think nobody here has noticed?
I think you have a lot of animosity toward the truth and anyone who promotes the truth. You are letting your political bias spill over into science. I say that ...[text shortened]... rong 100% of the time. Why do you want to believe people you hate can never be right about anything?
07 Apr 23
Suzi is a mindless troll. She does not even have a basic understanding of science, yet she come to the science forum to lie and troll. She is like an ape that lives to throw dung until she hits something purely by chance.
Ignore the trolls. They have nothing to offer here and they are simply envious of anyone that does. Their ad hominem attacks prove that.
@metal-brain saidWhy don’t you read up on it a little instead of posting childlike questions?
Was that determined by finding galaxies 13.8 billion light years away?
What exactly is your issue here?
- Joined
- 20 May 17
- Moves
- 17567
@metal-brain saidno, it's by reversing the expansion of the universe and going back to the big bang...
Was that determined by finding galaxies 13.8 billion light years away?
08 Apr 23
@divegeester said“If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself.”
Why don’t you read up on it a little instead of posting childlike questions?
What exactly is your issue here?
― Albert Einstein
08 Apr 23
@mlb62 saidThat is another theory. Some people refer to that as the "big crunch theory". The expansion is accelerating so there is no sign of reversal. For that reason the big crunch theory is not as popular as it used to be.
no, it's by reversing the expansion of the universe and going back to the big bang...
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
09 Apr 23
@metal-brain saidFive year old, and no, he didn't say that.
“If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself.”
― Albert Einstein
Come on, you can't even get your misattributed quotes "right"!
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
09 Apr 23
@metal-brain saidAh. Found the young-Earth creationist.
There is no evidence. That is why it is a theory.
@shallow-blue saidHow do you know that for sure? What is your source of information?
Five year old, and no, he didn't say that.
Come on, you can't even get your misattributed quotes "right"!
https://nineplanets.org/questions/how-old-is-the-universe/
13 Apr 23
@metal-brain saidYour quote does not appear in the book "The Ultimate Quotable Einstein" by Alice Calaprice, 2011. (An illicit pdf of the entire book can be found online.)
How do you know that for sure? What is your source of information?
https://nineplanets.org/questions/how-old-is-the-universe/
What Einstein did write once was this: "All physical theories, their mathematical expressions notwithstanding, ought to lend themselves to so simple a description that even a child could understand them."
Misattributed to Einstein is this quote: "You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother."
Your quote is just a variation of this misattribution, which seems to be a product of the internet made a decade or two back. The author ceased to add more misattributions by around 2010, it seems, and maybe much earlier (see page xvii and beyond).
14 Apr 23
1 edit
@metal-brain saidHow do you explain gravitational theory? Do you think there is no evidence for gravity?
There is no evidence. That is why it is a theory.
https://ncse.ngo/gravity-its-only-theory
@athousandyoung said"The Brain" clearly does not understand the formal definition of the word "theory."
How do you explain gravitational theory? Do you think there is no evidence for gravity?
https://ncse.ngo/gravity-its-only-theory
15 Apr 23
@soothfast said"All physical theories, their mathematical expressions notwithstanding, ought to lend themselves to so simple a description that even a child could understand them."
Your quote does not appear in the book "The Ultimate Quotable Einstein" by Alice Calaprice, 2011. (An illicit pdf of the entire book can be found online.)
What Einstein did write once was this: "All physical theories, their mathematical expressions notwithstanding, ought to lend themselves to so simple a description that even a child could understand them."
Misattrib ...[text shortened]... dd more misattributions by around 2010, it seems, and maybe much earlier (see page xvii and beyond).
Close enough. Can't you explain it to a child?
15 Apr 23
@athousandyoung saidI cannot escape the earth by jumping. That is good evidence.
How do you explain gravitational theory? Do you think there is no evidence for gravity?
https://ncse.ngo/gravity-its-only-theory