- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by FMFMany of us fail to see just why you and divegeester are allowed to continue in this vein. Why are you not banned? Or at least, why are all your very nasty posts not deleted?
He is no more "stalking" Grampy Bobby than you are "stalking" divegeester. Your blatant hypocrisy is not as funny as you seem to think it is.
Bearing in mind that the moderators have proved that they will not hesitate to ban, how is it that what is very clearly, as Robbie says, an Internet stalking problem still being allowed to continue?
Originally posted by StartreaderTwo people on a message board agree about something ~ and someone disagrees with them, so out comes an attempted jibe about homosexuality? It's a bit like a thing a 14 boy would say in the playground, surely?
Oh, it's just Robbie's perfectly explicit way of pointing out how inseparable the two of you appear to be.
27 Jan 16
Originally posted by StartreaderMaybe the web site administrators and their moderators don't see it the same way as you and robbie do. Maybe they use a different - more conventional - definition of "stalking" than simply using it as an epithet thrown at regular posters - whom you disapprove of - having debates and disagreements with other regular posters - whom you approve of. Just a thought.
Bearing in mind that the moderators have proved that they will not hesitate to ban, how is it that what is very clearly, as Robbie says, an Internet stalking problem still being allowed to continue?
Originally posted by FMFOn the first ten pages of this thread you made reference to Grandpa Bobby either directly by name or indirectly with reference twenty times, more than the entire community combined until this point. Your friend (we wont use the term boyfriend in case it upsets you) ten times, more than any other single member.
On some level, Grampy Bobby, with your campaign for supposed "civility" and "etiquette" - you must surely sometimes be horrified that someone with robbie's persona and posting record is now one of your most vocal defenders.
Now clearly to any rational minded individual that is a worrying trend and is difficult to explain in any other terms other than you stalk and harass him. Do you have any other explanation for this disparity?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell, I haven't used the word "morality". But it's an interesting Freudian slip on your part... that you yourself are looking upon the criticisms levelled at you in terms of how you are coming across with regard to your "morality". I didn't introduce the word. You have.
I will be taking no lessons in morality from you. Thats for sure.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRegular and relatively prolific posters creating a high volume of posts in extended discussions on various topics. What proportion of your posts are addressed to me or divegeester or Suzianne? What proportion of Suzianne's posts are addressed to me? What proportion of Stratreader's posts have been directed at me? The answers are: it doesn't matter. To try to smear lively to and fro as "stalking" is nonsense.
Now clearly to any rational minded individual that is a worrying trend and is difficult to explain in any other term,s other than you stalk and harass him. Do you have any other explanation for this disparity?
Originally posted by FMFWhy don't we just stick to the evidence, shall we? here in this thread in the first ten pages (the trend actually gets worse as it progresses) you make more references to Grandpa Bobby than the entire community combined. Why is that? How are we to explain it in any terms other than you stalk and harass him?
Well, I haven't used the word "morality". But it's an interesting Freudian slip on your part... that you yourself are looking upon the criticisms levelled at you in terms of how you are coming across with regard to your "morality". I didn't introduce the word. You have.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI am no more "harassing" and "stalking" him than you are "harassing" and "stalking" me. You simply use these words to try to inhibit people you disagree with from posting stuff you don't like.
Now clearly to any rational minded individual that is a worrying trend and is difficult to explain in any other terms other than you stalk and harass him.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell, the thread was started by Grampy Bobby. The OP is about Grampy Bobby. The topic is Grampy Bobby. So we are talking about Grampy Bobby. And presumably that was his purpose when he started this thread. All my comments about him and addressed to him are therefore on topic.
...here in this thread in the first ten pages (the trend actually gets worse as it progresses) you make more references to Grandpa Bobby than the entire community combined. Why is that? How are we to explain it in any terms other than you stalk and harass him?
Originally posted by FMFYou and your friend seem completely obsessed with GB. You name him either directly or indirectly in I would say about 85 percent of your posts on the first ten pages and the trend gets even worse. Divesgeester likewise is completely obsessed. So you cannot attempt to hide it in the fact that you have engaged with others because the preponderance of your own posts, regardless of others are clearly obsessing over GB. Why is that? How are we to explain it in any other terms other than your desire to stalk and harass him? Do you think you should be offering people advice on forum etiquette when you are possibly the worst offender here?
Regular and relatively prolific posters creating a high volume of posts in extended discussions on various topics. What proportion of your posts are addressed to me or divegeester or Suzianne? What proportion of Suzianne's posts are addressed to me? What proportion of Stratreader's posts have been directed at me? The answers are: it doesn't matter. To try to smear lively to and fro as "stalking" is nonsense.