Originally posted by divegeesterAlso, please provide the thread names and page numbers of your statements in my Site Ideas thread as previously requested there.
I've already given you one example of your inappropriate use of the name of a dear family friend's name. You know exactly what I'm taking about and I will gladly look up you use of it as and when you categorically deny that you did.
Otherwise, there is no basis for further discussion..
Originally posted by divegeesterThread name and page number, please.
I've already given you one example of your inappropriate use of the name of a dear family friend's name. You know exactly what I'm taking about and I will gladly look up you use of it as and when you categorically deny that you did.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbySo why did you start this thread GB?
The unsolicited anonymous subscription renewal on my behalf occurred seven or eight days after the previous subscription expired on January 6, 2016. The medical issues mentioned in the this thread's original post are still unresolved. Next doctor's appointment is February 15, 2016.
divegeester, it would seem Grampy Bobby is just flat out denying trying to leverage your family friend's (unknown) opinion against you to score cheap forum points. As for me, I remember the incident well.
A while ago, when I pointed out that Grampy Bobby had asked a rather revealing/hypocritical question on the 'Things You'd Like To Know' thread, he went into the same 'denial' mode, pretending no such thing had happened, and asking over and over again where/when this question was supposedly asked, and when I told him exactly what day he had made his post on he then just ignored it - just blanked it out - pretended it hadn't happened.
You are getting the same thing with the noxious little barb he slipped in about your family friend. He's in denial mode. The 'page number' routine is just a delaying tactic.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieGrampy Bobby clearly does not hold himself to the same rules of behaviour or standards of decency that he tries to apply to others. It is no wonder that this kind of hypocrisy appeals to you.
more retrospective old house wife gossip, Grandpa Bobby said this, Grandpa Bobby said that, please shad-up-a-yo-face
Originally posted by FMFAlso, Grampy Bobby's supporters don't see this side of him. When he uses this type of information in a post it looks complete innocuous to the casual readers who of course struggle to understand why people get upset by it.
divegeester, it would seem Grampy Bobby is just flat out denying trying to leverage your family friend's (unknown) opinion against you to score cheap forum points. As for me, I remember the incident well.
A while ago, when I pointed out that Grampy Bobby had asked a rather revealing/hypocritical question on the 'Things You'd Like To Know' thread, he went int ...[text shortened]... ut your family friend. He's in denial mode. The 'page number' routine is just a delaying tactic.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis behaviour is NOT retrospective; Grampy Bobby was reprimanded within the last couple of weeks for dragging up personal information on a poster and using it inappropriately in the forum.
more retrospective old house wife gossip, Grandpa Bobby said this, Grandpa Bobby said that, please shad-up-a-yo-face
Originally posted by divegeestermore moralizing over other people - please shad-up-a-yo-face
This behaviour is NOT retrospective; Grampy Bobby was reprimanded within the last couple of weeks for dragging up personal information on a poster and using inappropriately in the forum.
Same here. He quickly edited the bit of personal info he used
against me, which I shared in a private forum where we were both
members at the same time for a few days.
Of course, we know his opinion about people who commit suicide.
So, it is not a surprise how little regard and respect he has for people
who face terminal illness --as long as he can use it to try to manipulate
others in his perennial deliriums of grandeur and Machiavellianism.