15 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieGee.......they played you like a fiddle. Got you slobbering and grovelling big time.
Look guys this is getting sinister. I don't mind a little forum banter but this has clearly gone beyond that. Fmf I am truly sorry if this has caused you distress. You are absolutely correct it is not a subject for forum banter. I do not suspect for one moment that you represent a danger to anyone although you can be infuriating at times. As to ...[text shortened]... This is way beyond that and I am out. Sorry once again for any distress that has been caused.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieFair play; a little late, but credit where it's due.
Look guys this is getting sinister. I don't mind a little forum banter but this has clearly gone beyond that. Fmf I am truly sorry if this has caused you distress. You are absolutely correct it is not a subject for forum banter. I do not suspect for one moment that you represent a danger to anyone although you can be infuriating at times. As to ...[text shortened]... This is way beyond that and I am out. Sorry once again for any distress that has been caused.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDon't be silly. There is no "distress". You overestimate yourself. You come across as nothing more than a poisonous clown stuck in his teenage years. But thanks for the apology. Let's hope it's a sign that you are going to grow up some time soon. If it's not a sign of that, then it will probably end up being nothing different from the insincere facetious apologies you've made before.
I just want to make fun of people and have people make fun of me and to talk copious amounts of dwool. This is way beyond that and I am out. Sorry once again for any distress that has been caused.
So, once again, thanks for the apology. If it's something you genuinely mean and that you decided to give on your own bat, and not something you have been told to say, then as divegeester says: fair play 🙂
Originally posted by FMFGee if I knew I was going to get a lecture I may have thought twice. 😵
Don't be silly. There is no "distress". You overestimate yourself. You come across as nothing more than a poisonous clown stuck in his teenage years. But thanks for the apology. Let's hope it's a sign that you are going to grow up some time soon. If it's not a sign of that, then it will probably end up being nothing different from the insincere facetious apologi ...[text shortened]... our own bat, and not something you have been told to say, then as divegeester says: fair play 🙂
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAfter reflecting on the Australian Royal Commission and the arguments you have presented in that discussion (where I presume a lot of what you said was sourced from the same well of 'funny' banter you almost always draw from), do you think you'd make a good Child Protection Ombudsman for your organization if they had such a role?
I really think that these forums are nothing but a propaganda war. Yet even in war there are rules of engagement. I was of the opinion that it was Realpolitik and as Prussian chancellor Bismark stated going to war with principles is like walking through a forest with an oar between ones teeth. I have no stomach for this.
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFYes par excellence! I would simply investigate all allegations with my rusty saw. If found guilty id lop off their goolies with it. Panic over problem solved.
After reflecting on the Australian Royal Commission and the arguments you have presented in that discussion (where I presume a lot of what you said was sourced from the same well of 'funny' banter you almost always draw from), do you think you'd make a good Child Protection Ombudsman for your organization if they had such a role?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe banter you just apologized for is over surely? It's a serious question about a serious subject with real life victims who were children. You stand by the whole line of argument about the supposed "empty" threat? As an Ombudsman you would buy into that kind of offering by a suspected child abuser or people trying to protect him?
Yes par excellence! I would simply investigate all allegations with my rusty saw. If found guilty id lop off their goolies with it. Panic over problem solved.
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFOn the contrary I favour castration. Seriously for child abusers, rapists and other sexual deviants. Just lop them off. Problem solved panic over.
The banter you just apologized for is over surely? It's a serious question about a serious subject with real life victims who were children. You stand by the whole line of argument about the supposed "empty" threat? As an Ombudsman you would buy into that kind of offering by a suspected child abuser or people trying to protect him?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou dodged the question, robbie: here it is ~ Do you stand by the whole line of argument you offered yesterday about the supposed "empty" threat? Would you actually buy into that kind of defence by [or of] a suspected child abuser?
On the contrary I favour castration. Seriously for child abusers, rapists and other sexual deviants. Just lop them off. Problem solved panic over.