Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo need for this comedy stuff, robbie. This is a serious topic and you are making 'arguments' that raise serious questions
Asking loaded questions is also intellectually dishonest, why you feel the need to attempt to dupe people I really have no idea, clearly you have not learned from your masquerade as a women.
.
14 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFTry sticking to what I have stated instead of attempting top misrepresent it with intellectually dishonest and loaded questions. Who knows you may do better.
Stick with this serious topic, why don't you robbie, don't go for the catchphrases. How would a sexually abused child know that the threats of the authority figure who had sexually abused her were "empty"?
Originally posted by FMFyou were caught again FMF asking loaded questions on the basis of values that I had not expressed, its not my fault you are intellectuality dishonest and attempt to dupe people at every turn.
No need for this comedy stuff, robbie. This is a serious topic and you are making 'arguments' that raise serious questions
.
14 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf she was frightened not only by having been sexually abused but also frightened by being threatened, might that not discourage her from reporting the person who had both abused her and threatened her?
I claim nothing other than her testimony contains empty threats that could never have been carried out and even if they had it would not have prevented her from informing anyone..
Originally posted by FMFI am interested in facts not in speculation. If you have any let me know I'd be interested to read them.
If she was frightened not only by having been sexually abused but also frightened by being threatened, might that not discourage her from reporting the person who had both abused her and threatened her?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut aren't you speculating about what the effect of sex abuse and threats were on the psychological state of a sex abuse victim? Aren't you arguing that she must have realized the threats by her abuser were "empty"?Is this not speculation on your part?
I am interested in facts not in speculation. If you have any let me know I'd be interested to read them.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRobbie why argue with bigot's, their hate has to find a target, it's the JW just now they will group to attack another target soon. must give their empty lives some sort of thrill.
If you are having trouble understanding what I have stated ask someone for help because its rather tedious to have to explain it to you when it has been stated clearly and plainly on numerous occasions. Asking loaded questions is also intellectually dishonest, why you feel the need to attempt to dupe people I really have no idea, clearly you have not learned from your masquerade as a women.
Not one of the clones seem bothered by the fact their big mouthed small brained leader, pretended to be a girl in a site that has children on it. i find that disgusting.
Enjoy your veggie burgar and irn bru, watch them been rattled.
Originally posted by GHOST HUNTERI strongly recommend that you contact the web site and let them know the reasons for your suspicions.
Not one of the clones seem bothered by the fact their big mouthed small brained leader, pretended to be a girl in a site that has children on it. i find that disgusting.
Originally posted by FMFAs long as he did not pretend to be a little girl. i see no problem with giving Robbie the job.
Listening to the arguments he has been laying out here, does anybody think robbie carrobie would make a credible Child Protection Ombudsman if his organization had such a role?
EDIT, can your wee thumb up clone not post? they must be ashamed of you, i feel embarrassed for you.
Originally posted by FMFi am talking straight to you, you seem rattled, truth hurt?
On a matter like this, you should speak directly to the web site and not me as it is them who will probably be legally liable if they don't take the correct action.
mmm that sounds like a threat, true colours showing?
