Memo

Originally posted by divegeester
What exactly is it you are wondering? Please explain.

i am wondering
how do you find the time to post so much idiotic rubbish.
you and FMF are boring us slowly to death.

Originally posted by FMF
Where do you most of your posting ~ on the Clans Forum?

so you own the general forum?
members can post where they want

Originally posted by FMF
So you are wondering out loud whether I was abused by a pedophile when I was a child?

it depends
were you a little boy or pretending to be a little girl at the time?

Originally posted by FMF
[b]Only this week the head of the catholic church stated that Bishops are not under duress to report suspected cases of child abuse where the law is not mandatory. If you had any real interest in the issue you would have looked at it objectively and looked at the issues facing those whose role as confessors may come into conflict with secular law putting them i ...[text shortened]... on behalf of the Catholic Church, I'm sure they'll get into the same kind of tangle as you have.

Bump for ghost hunter as you avoided answering.

In your opinion, is the report highlighting a cover up of child abuse or not?

Originally posted by divegeester
Bump for ghost hunter as you avoided answering.

In your opinion, is the report highlighting a cover up of child abuse or not?

do you think anyone apart from your clones gives a toss what your or FMF opinion is on here,
get a life man/women/other

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
do you think anyone apart from your clones gives a toss what your or FMF opinion is on here,
get a life man/women/other

But I'm asking you what your opinion is as you seem to have contradicted yourself.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I am not entirely sure I understand what you are saying as you are using some terms that I am unfamiliar with. My text was not an attempt to address law or whether law has an inherent morality or not but a practical perspective on some of the issues that have a bearing on the reporting of child abuse for ministers of religion and what may have been ...[text shortened]... orroborative evidence on one hand and the need to protect those who are vulnerable on the other.

It's simple: if not mandated by law, are you ok with child abuse going unreported?

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
[b]do you think anyone apart from robin gives a toss what your opinion is on here,
get a life man/women/poltergeist

LOL

Originally posted by divegeester
But I'm asking you what your opinion is as you seem to have contradicted yourself.

you seem rattled
my opinion is. you are a complete idiot, an obvious 3a with FMF, a liar a bully a coward a bore a total useless chess player
jog on son, your out of your depth

Originally posted by Captain Strange
LOL

its against TOS to make changes to quotes, i am sending feed back

bye bye little clone, enjoy your ban

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
you seem rattled
my opinion is. you are a complete idiot, an obvious 3a with FMF, a liar a bully a coward a bore a total useless chess player
jog on son, your out of your depth

Are you going to say what you really think about the report by the Australian royal commission into child sex abuse?

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
its against TOS to make changes to quotes, i am sending feed back

bye bye little clone, enjoy your ban

You seem upset.

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
its against TOS to make changes to quotes, i am sending feed back

bye bye little clone, enjoy your ban

Lost your sense of humour.
Running to Russ.
Does not strike me as the actions of a director with the use of your company plane
if that rattles you.

Originally posted by Seitse
It's simple: if not mandated by law, are you ok with child abuse going unreported?

No and it begs belief how you could extricate the idea from my text. Perhaps you might explain your thought process.

Originally posted by divegeester
You seem upset.

You seem like a clone