Originally posted by Proper KnobHow do you know, have you ever said anything positive, no? well you just may be a religious bigot.
I have been a vocal critic of your religious organisation and others and other religions for many years on the Spirituality forum. That doesn't make me a religious bigot.
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo now I 'may be a religious bigot'. You're as mad as a hatter!!!
How do you know, have you ever said anything positive, no? well you just may be a religious bigot.
I've never said anything positive about the Conservative party, does that make me a 'political bigot'?
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by Proper KnobIn English the word "bigot" refers to a person whose habitual state of mind includes an obstinate, irrational, or unfair intolerance of ideas, opinions, ethnicities, or beliefs that differ from their own, and intolerance of the people who hold them.
I have been a vocal critic of your religious organisation and others and other religions for many years on the Spirituality forum. That doesn't make me a religious bigot.
habitually critical - check
obstinate - check
irrational - check
intolerance of beliefs - check
unfair - check
Dude id check my vitals if I were you!
Originally posted by FMF to robbie carrobierobbie, Any mention of the well documented cases of cover ups of child sex abuse by your organization and you seem to get very flustered and attack the messenger every time.
You've been acting awfully flustered since page 227.
Take a leaf from my book; when I was a Christian I never once felt the need to defend the Catholic Church's abysmal record on covering up child abuse.
What's more, I certainly never felt the need to attack people for raising the issue or expressing their disgust with the organization's actions.
11 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFyes it must be true if you sat its true, a submarine commander you say,
robbie, Any mention of the well documented cases of cover ups of child sex abuse by your organization and you seem to get very flustered and attack the messenger every time.
Take a leaf from my book; when I was a Christian I never once felt the need to defend the Catholic Church's abysmal record on covering up child abuse.
What's more, I certainly never ...[text shortened]... attack people for raising the issue or expressing their disgust with the organization's actions.
wow that must have been amazing,
World War I and II,
wow i didn't know they has submarines back them,
sure i wanna see your medals,
wow it looks like a Quality Street sweet,
must be a coincidence.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's a serious subject robbie.
yes it must be true if you sat its true, a submarine commander you say,
wow that must have been amazing,
World War I and II,
wow i didn't know they has submarines back them,
sure i wanna see your medals,
wow it looks like a Quality Street sweet,
must be a coincidence.
Originally posted by FMFSo you said it and not Jeester, why are you making things up and trying to palm them off as if Jeester claimed them?
I am saying he [b]has not claimed anything about restrictions that need to be placed on your freedom to worship as you see fit, except in terms of protecting minors when necessary.[/b]