@wildgrass saidIf someone has not been approved and qualified to vote in a certain referendum or election, their name written in the voting ledgers, should they be allowed to vote? That is the question. wildgrass is a liberal of the highest order. I beat him at every turn. He will NOT answer this question.
Yikes, Joe asks a question, everyone answers. Then Joe rants about no one answering his questions.
AND the question itself was insane. Should illegal things be illegal?
A better question, Joe: why is the speaker of the house flying to mar a Lago to meet with the former president and declare they're making things illegal that are already illegal?
He says my question was/.."Should illegal things be illegal?' Stomach sickness, thanks a lot. Now you have Suzianne and Kev thinking that that was my question which it was not. when you go to your place of work, do you ride your bike backwards?
255d
@sonhouse saidThanks foe anserng the question. You really bested the squirmy Wildgrass,,,,,or was it Spruce. Libs will put you on a really bad list. Uhh, why did you write about Trump?
@AverageJoe1
Is there something wrong with us just saying NO, aliens should not be able to vote in the US federal elections? I don't suppose you know about the already existing federal law against that which clearly means nothing to you and the rest of the Trump religion crowd. Trump says jump you go how high your majesty?
255d
@wildgrass saidThat is not a 'better question' though, is it. If Sonhouse asks me a question about Trump and I respond with a question about Truman, is that a better question?
Yikes, Joe asks a question, everyone answers. Then Joe rants about no one answering his questions.
AND the question itself was insane. Should illegal things be illegal?
A better question, Joe: why is the speaker of the house flying to mar a Lago to meet with the former president and declare they're making things illegal that are already illegal?
255d
@kewpie saidActually one of my favorite subjects, which I did a thread on a few yers ago, is that 'Why' is basically irrelevant. If I tell you I am late to the party, and you ask why. and I am standing there, Why is truly irrelevant. Would be glad to discuss it, start a thread. Drove my daughter crazy with it for years, and she could never defeat the argument.
That's too hard for joe. He's the kindergarten kid who says
* why?
the adult tells him in simple words.
* but why?
adult patiently repeats simple answer.
* but you don't say just why?
adult tries a more detailed answer, but patience is wearing thin.
* but you never answer my questions. why can't you give me an answer?
adult, at his wit's end: either "go play in th ...[text shortened]... " or "because I said so"
* stamps foot and runs to mom for sympathy.
Joe - you're the asterisk.
My other argument is that what other people do is irrelevant to me, I know you, as a liberal, would HATE that one.
@averagejoe1 saidWhy do you think I am a liberal? I'm definitely not any of your idiotic labels. I'm a believer in rational discussion, and I'm proud not to be American if you're an example. I think back to a decision made by my father (America or Australia) and am so happy he lost the coin-toss in 1924.
Actually one of my favorite subjects, which I did a thread on a few yers ago, is that 'Why' is basically irrelevant. If I tell you I am late to the party, and you ask why. and I am standing there, Why is truly irrelevant. Would be glad to discuss it, start a thread. Drove my daughter crazy with it for years, and she could never defeat the argument.
My other argu ...[text shortened]... ent is that what other people do is irrelevant to me, I know you, as a liberal, would HATE that one.
@averagejoe1 saidSomeone who is not registered to vote cannot vote. And if he tries, then a) he is in breach of the law, and b) his 'vote' will not be tallied.
Discounting the plethora of Sunhouse post, the question is much simpler than that.
You are aware. I am sure that, for someone to be listed on the voter rolls, that they would have had to have been approved to be able to vote? If you agree, here is the question. Can someone who is not approved, not on the rolls, vote?
A simple question. Thankyou. It is so simpl ...[text shortened]... , he CAN vote.
I think my questions are so easy that you think I am trying to trick you fellers?
What's yer problem with that ?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120990
@kewpie saidMaybe also thank the AUZ firewall immigration policy which along with NZ are the toughest in the (free/Western) world.
Why do you think I am a liberal? I'm definitely not any of your idiotic labels. I'm a believer in rational discussion, and I'm proud not to be American if you're an example. I think back to a decision made by my father (America or Australia) and am so happy he lost the coin-toss in 1924.
255d
@wildgrass saidThere is no peak to stupidity, like there is no biggest number...
I don't know who needs to hear this, but spending tax dollars getting the speaker of the house together with the loser of a presidential election at Mar-a-Lago to discuss making it illegal for non-citizens to vote when IT'S ALREADY ILLEGAL seems we're getting close to peak MAGA stupidity.
- Joined
- 09 Sep 10
- Moves
- 2501
255d
@divegeester saidExactly 💯
Maybe also thank the AUZ firewall immigration policy which along with NZ are the toughest in the (free/Western) world.
Yet they act like they know what's best for countries that actually have immigrants and the problems that come with them.
- Joined
- 09 Sep 10
- Moves
- 2501
@kewpie saidRational discussion?
Why do you think I am a liberal? I'm definitely not any of your idiotic labels. I'm a believer in rational discussion, and I'm proud not to be American if you're an example. I think back to a decision made by my father (America or Australia) and am so happy he lost the coin-toss in 1924.
You liberals think men can be women.
Rational my ass.
- Joined
- 09 Sep 10
- Moves
- 2501
@shavixmir saidYou just did what you're condemning us for.
"You liberals"
Sweeping generalistic charactaristics are reserved for republikunts, who with their ideas and non-policies are generally considered moronic, retarded or mong.
You smell.
255d
@ponderable saidIch stimme zu.
There is no peak to stupidity, like there is no biggest number...
The correct thread title would have been 'is this MAGA's nadir?'
To which the correct answer would have been, 'you ain't seen nuthin' yet!'