Announcements
14 Mar 08
19 Mar 08
Originally posted by Very RustyI come up with 300.3333333
Could someone explain to me how these numbers add up to 320 Participants?
cmsMaster 42
irontigran 29
!~TONY~! 87
Korch 188
Gatecrasher 179
pineapple42 13
gezza 12
no1marauder 52
David Tebb 194
saffa73 6
Phlabibit 99
Participants 320
So my guess a few people either only voted for 1 or 2 people and not all 3.
Dave
19 Mar 08
1 edit
Originally posted by TalonBossMy retort was before that. Can't you read a complete post?
Hmmm, an idiot with an axe to grind. Nice retort.
I suppose I could now grind my axe against you, but I'm here to play chess not argue with a fool.
You didn't like what I wrote. Good for you.
Maybe I'll see you across the board someday. Until then have fun.
19 Mar 08
1 edit
Originally posted by NordlysGood point, it's highly unlikely I have to admit.
No, but it seems unlikely that anyone would spend several hundred dollars just to mess up a vote.
But I suppose someone could buy someone else a membership in trade for a few votes. Which is not beyond the ability for some to do. Which is really a different subject.
19 Mar 08
Originally posted by cashthetrashConsidering this is just a consultation vote, I'm sure Russ is hoping for lots of those. 😉
But I suppose someone might buy someone else a membership in trade for a few votes. Which is not beyond the ability for some to do. Which is really a different subject.
19 Mar 08
Originally posted by PhlabibitWhat I did say was,
You didn't say that, but since you've made a generalization that some are missing points, but won't say who... I question if you're talking about me missing a point, or Arrakis, or Playnka, or korch, or No1, or any number of posters here.
Who missed a point? You believe someone has, but that info isn't much help to anyone and raises more questions... at least in my mind.
P-
"It would be nice if everyone would stop being so touchy in the forums and actually read what people have written! It would be great if that happened. It would stop people getting the wrong end of the stick when they haven't read the whole thread, that's what causes the heated discussions in forums"
So, can you now see that I wasn't making any accusations of anyone in particular. It was a general observation of some threads/forums. If somebody sees it as a cap that fits - they can go ahead and wear it, but I didn't ask them to 😛
19 Mar 08
1 edit
Originally posted by PalynkaSkeeter is not running for 'Game Moderator' and has nothing to do with what was being talked about.
Even skeeter has been a PFC member. That proves nothing.
Red Night, to No1 marader:
I have to say that the 650 point discrepancy between your top rating here 3 years ago and your top USCF rating today would disqualify you in my mind.
We need to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
Phlabibit to RedNight:
Unless he was a member of your clan, then you would figure out an excuse why he's a brilliant choice for the team. P-
Here, Phlabibit is accusing Red of being a Hypocrite. But my point was that Phlabibit is being a hypocrite for trying to figure out an excuse why 'no1' is a brilliant choice for the team sense 'No1' was an ex team mate of Phlabibits just prior to this nomination. So it pretty much makes his point null and is just more cronyism.
What you are saying is just stupid, and completely off point. Your 'retarded shield' is leaking out please get it fixed.
19 Mar 08
1 edit
Originally posted by cashthetrashI just provided a counter-example of an ex-PFC member that you know wouldn't get any support from Phlab. So you need to base your accusation of 'cronyism' on something more.
Skeeter is not running for 'Game Moderator' and has nothing to do with what was being talked about.
[b]Red Night, to No1 marader:
I have to say that the 650 point discrepancy between your top rating here 3 years ago and your top USCF rating today would disqualify you in my mind.
We need to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
Ph d, and completely off point. Your 'retarded shield' is leaking out please get it fixed.[/b]
19 Mar 08
Originally posted by Pawn QweenIt's an intentional spin fest conspiracy. We need a new forum for such matters. Stick around and watch everyone in their new tin caps.
What I did say was,
"It would be nice if everyone would stop being so touchy in the forums and actually read what people have written! It would be great if that happened. It would stop people getting the wrong end of the stick when they haven't read the whole thread, that's what causes the heated discussions in forums"
So, can you now see that I was ...[text shortened]... dy sees it as a cap that fits - they can go ahead and wear it, but I didn't ask them to 😛
19 Mar 08
Originally posted by PalynkaYour counter example was rotten and still makes no sense. I could provide you with lots of ex clan mates of Reds that would get no support.
I just provided a counter-example of an ex-PFC member that you know wouldn't get any support from Phlab. So you need to base your accusation of 'cronyism' on something more.
I will base my accusations any way I see fit. And Phlabibt not supporting Skeeter still has nothing to do with the subject. It is not a question of who he doesn't support you ninny.